Letter to the Editor: Starting “Public Outcry” About Certain Books Will Not “Squelch Teenagers/Tweens Interest” in Them, Will Likely Do Opposite

To the Editor:

Discounting the 400+ signatures on the pro-library petition by saying it is a mere fraction of Old Lyme’s population is merely social conservatives taking a swipe at those who did sign it and trying to say that the majority of townsfolk wish to have the library censored. This is a continuation of what the right wing group Moms for Liberty is doing and also sounds like the parents in the late 1960s, who opposed school desegregation. I hear echoes of Gov. George Wallace in the words of those seeking to ban certain books.

A town library should be a place where every book should be available to everyone. If you do not like a certain book or magazine, simply do not read it! Instead of ranting about the book selection, perhaps consider that if your child is seeking knowledge at the [OL-]PGN Library, perhaps you have not provided the information your son or daughter needs to move along in life.

One supporter of book banning mentions sexual positions which may be harmful. Really? If that does not sound like a Puritan dog whistle, I don’t know what does. Does anyone really think that starting a public outcry about this will squelch a teenagers/tweens interest in trying something new?

The library has these books partly because they provide a clearer explanation of behaviors, which one can easily see on the internet. This allows better choices. All you have done is attracted greater interest towards reading said books and enthusiasm for attempting the acts, which might be illustrated. Conservatives never learn.

The staff at the [OL-]PGN library are a group of amazing women. The two, who are directly involved in the lives of children and teens, Julie and Nikki, are brilliant, kind and have the best intentions towards their young patrons. What they deserve from all of us is respect and from those protesting about certain books, an apology. The actions of those advocating censorship are the reason why many of us are repelled by conservatives.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Wilder,
Old Lyme.

Letter to the Editor: More Thoughts on the Passing of Old Lyme’s ‘Statesman-in-Residence’

To the Editor:

Last week-Old Lyme lost its statesman-in-residence, Lowell Weicker, who lived on Lyme Street near the Library Lane intersection; and even before that, in a cottage on Ball Lane, which must have barely contained his 6 foot, 6 inches.  I do not want to repeat his extensive list of accomplishments, which have already been noted in several tributes, but rather amplify one area, which has had a long impact on the nation’s health.

Senator Weicker played a prominent role in securing funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to conduct clinical trials on HIV/AIDS at a time when it was sharply opposed by then President Reagan. He knew the importance of government involvement in disease research and increased appropriations for the NIH. He also sponsored the Protection and Advocacy for the Mentally Ill Act in 1985 and in 1988 introduced legislation that would become the Americans with Disabilities Act. He told the Courant that “my crowning achievement was I wrote most of the disabilities laws in the country.”

Many still only remember that as governor of the state with the largest deficit in the nation. he found it necessary to come to grips with and then overhaul CT’s tax laws. He has been described as “blunt”, “feisty”, and “larger than life”. I guess it’s a combination of all three.

In closing, my best to his family. I also want to recognize Claudia Weicker’s important development work as Chair of the Roger Tory Peterson Estuary Center.

Sincerely,

Thomas D. Gotowka,
Old Lyme.

Letter to the Editor: Author of Letter Requesting Removal of Book From Old Lyme Library’s Teen/Tween Room Asks for ‘Thoughtful, Deliberate Discussion’

To the Editor:

Sadly, some have been whipped into a frenzy applying phrases such as book bans, anti-LGBTQ, and even….fascist.  An enlightened community should encourage thoughtful and deliberate discussion.  

Movies have a rating system: G, PG, PG-13, R, NC-17 (adult). No one is “banning” movies. These ratings exist to protect children and inform adults. If you drop your 11-year-old at the movies expecting them to see Finding Nemo and they instead watch Fifty Shades of Grey – you would be understandably concerned.   

I authored this letter to the library as we believe some of the content in the Teen/Tween (11+) room contains adult content and is thus not age appropriate for this space.  

The library has a process for our request and we look forward to their thoughtful deliberation and outcome.  Let’s respectfully allow the library board to do their work!

Sincerely,

Steve Spooner,
Old Lyme.

Letter to the Editor: Consensus Clear That Halls Rd. is an Eyesore, But How Do We Really Want it to Look?

To the Editor:

I took this photo (above) of the mixed use development to the Main Street in South Portland, Maine. This could be a blueprint for Halls Road if the Halls Road Improvements Committee (HRIC) zoning changes are adopted.

Halls Road is and will always be a service road not an area for residential development. Any development should be limited to service oriented business, examples being health care facilities, urgent care facility as well as businesses that support the highways.

We all agree that Halls Road in its current configuration is an eyesore but overreacting and approving the HRIC proposed changes to zoning regulations may make a bad situation worse.

Sincerely,

William Folland
Old Lyme.

Letter to the Editor: Give Overlay District a Chance, ‘Modified HROD … a Wise Step for our Town to Take’

To the Editor:

Let’s give the Halls Road Overlay District the full consideration it requires.

I have been living in Old Lyme since 2015 and am grateful for the thoughtful work of fellow residents stepping up to serve on our town’s commissions and boards.  For the Zoning and Planning Commissions, among others, the pressures facing our town are escalating, and meeting those challenges will require an agile and forward-thinking approach to their important roles if the town is to prosper without losing all that makes it such a special place.

I understand why the proposed Halls Road Overlay District has yet to win sufficient approval from these commissions, but am convinced that at its heart, and in its careful construction, the modified HROD would be a wise step for our town to take.

Despite its proximity and its containing a number of excellent retail businesses that I enjoy shopping in, I rarely go to Halls Road.  When friends passing through suggest getting together for a coffee or a bite, I never propose Halls Road, despite its convenience, because I want my friends’ experience of town to be more pleasant than the drive down Halls Road.  To put it bluntly, it is an ugly commercial strip dominated by underused parking lots.

My point is that it is entirely unclear to me what we are being precious about in the footprint of the proposed overlay district.  Certainly requiring sufficient infrastructure and ensuring the ground and surface water quality in the area are not negatively impacted will be important considerations in granting individual permits under the proposed overlay.  Building permits will also require town approval to make sure they are aesthetically in keeping with the overlay district’s purpose.

It is, however, difficult for me to understand what if anything anyone would be concerned with preserving in the current purely commercial strip.  It is (with competition from some of the development around Exit 71) currently the most unappealing part of Old Lyme, and entirely out of character with the rest of town.  Based on most permit applications in the last years, it appears under current zoning to only be likely to either get worse, or stagnate.

I hope the members of the Zoning and Planning Commissions can envision the vibrant mixed-use district that the HROD advances: walkable, bikeable, shoppable, livable; providing housing for younger and older folks without gobbling up our irreplaceable open space. These commissions’ attention to the overlay district’s details has made it stronger and will ultimately determine how successful its implementation is.

I thank the commissions again for their service and consideration, and urge them to help Old Lyme into a creative, vibrant, and sustainable future by studying, vetting, and ultimately approving something along the lines of the improved Halls Road Overlay District.  I believe the affected businesses, landowners, and the whole town will be better off for it.

Sincerely,

Olaf Bertram-Nothnagel,
Old Lyme.

Editor’s Note: The author informs us that this letter has also been submitted to the Old Lyme Planning and Zoning Commissions.