Letter to the Editor: Fogliano, Candidate for Region 18 BOE, Explains Why She is Running Again, Why Her Prior Experience on BOE is Important Now

To the Editor: 

My name is Susan Fogliano, and I am a candidate for the Regional School District #18 Board of Education in the November 7 municipal election. As a resident of Old Lyme for nearly 32 years, I was proud to serve as a member of our Board of Education for 16 years between 1995 and 2011, and as Chair of the Board during my tenure. As Board Chairperson, I oversaw completion of a long-term renovation project of all five school buildings, culminating in the passage of the Lyme-Old Lyme High School project. 

I have been a lifelong advocate for public education in all its forms. I served for ten years on the Regional Board of Education, as well as on private boards and foundations, and have engaged in Board member professional development. 

I have been a full time classroom teacher and substitute teacher as well, and have worked in Madison, Lyme-Old Lyme, East Lyme, and Old Saybrook. 

Why am I running again? Since retiring, I find that I miss public service. I am troubled by the introduction of national culture wars and partisan politics into our local governance. I believe I can elevate the Board discourse to keep the focus on students, staff, parents, and taxpayers in our community. 

Why does it matter now? Experience has taught me that political and personal agendas have no place at the Board of Education table. There are suggestions by some opposing candidates that our school libraries should be “surveyed”, and that the District’s curriculum should be “edited”. Our school district is and has been among the most highly ranked systems in both the State and the nation. We do not need to direct resources to unnecessary fixes. 

What do I hope to accomplish? Using my energy and experience, I will work in a non-partisan fashion to maintain our excellent school district, using a common sense approach to make the best use of taxpayer dollars. 

The Old Lyme Democrats have assembled an amazing slate of qualified candidates dedicated to our community, and I am proud to be among them. I respectfully ask for your vote. 

With gratitude.

Sincerely,

Susan Fogliano,
Old Lyme.

Letter to the Editor: Vote for Republican Incumbents on Old Lyme Board of Finance to Maintain Sound Fiscal Stewardship

To the Editor:

I am writing this letter to inform the voters of Old Lyme just how capable our Board of Finance Members are. I have been a member of the Board of Finance for almost 20 years and it’s Chair for 16 of those years.  I do so to ask you to vote for the Republican incumbents running for our Board of Finance this year.

Here is the why in this ask:

  • The Republican led Board of Finance majority has an impeccable track record of fiscal responsibility.  This BOF has kept taxes low with a stable mill rate for years now.  Here is the record for your perusal.
  • Year 2023-2024 – 0% increase in taxes (zero increase in mill rate).
  • Year 2022-2023 – 2.8% increase in taxes.
  • Year 2021-2022 – 1.1% increase in taxes.

This legacy of careful and judicious financial management makes Old Lyme’s taxes both reasonable and affordable.

All of this sound fiscal stewardship has occurred while the Town has spent money where it is needed.

These achievements have occurred because we have had the right people on the Board of Finance, and they need to be re-elected to assure this admirable fiscal stewardship continues.

I have had the privilege of working closely with these three members that are up for re-election: 

H. Perry Garvin III (Full Member – Board of Finance)

Mr. Garvin has served the Town of Old Lyme on the Board of Finance for 26 years.  He is one of the people who has guided the Board of Finance through many years of financial challenges with focus on fiscal responsibility.

Mr. Garvin is a lifelong resident of Old Lyme where both he and his children attended Lyme – Old Lyme schools.

Mr. Garvin brings an essential historical perspective and great experience in our Board of Finance.  He has intimate knowledge of Old Lyme finances and revenue details.

Maria Corrao Marchant (Alternate – Board of Finance)

Maria has served on the Board as an Alternate since 2019.  She has demonstrated sound financial management in her decisions and tenacity in drilling down into the details.

Maria has a strong financial management background as a self-employed person in the healthcare industry for over 20 years.  She is a lifelong resident of Old Lyme and therefore believes in keeping the Town fiscally sound.  She attended the District 18 school system just as her two daughters have.

Matthew Olson (Alternate – Board of Finance)

Matt hold degrees including a Bachelor of Arts and an Executive MBA and has a strong finance and management background.  He is currently a Senior Director of Travelers Insurance in Hartford.  Prior to his private sector career, Matt retired as a Commander in the U.S. Navy.

Matt has served on the Board of Finance as an Alternate since 2019 and has lived in Old Lyme since 2009.  His three children all graduated from the Old Lyme school system.

Matt has been a steady supporter of keeping Old Lyme properly funded but with affordable taxes.

These three incumbent candidates should be re-elected based on their exemplary accomplishments on the Board of Finance.  We need them to help keep our town in the stable financial position we are in currently.  Please join me in voting for Maria, Matt, and Mr. Garvin on November 7th.

Sincerely,

Andy Russell,
Old Lyme.
Editor’s Note: The author is a member of the Old Lyme Board of Finance.

Letter to the Editor: Old Lyme Planning Commission Candidate Makes Case for Merging Planning, Zoning Commissions

To the Editor:

I have lived in Old Lyme for 19 years and am deeply committed to its welfare, including its economic vitality. To that end I have served on the town’s Economic Development Commission and continue to serve on the Board of Selectmen’s Halls Road Improvements Committee. I am now running for election to the Old Lyme Planning Commission. Decisions made by the Planning Commission and the Zoning Commission are of the utmost importance to our town. They determine how we may use our property and how those uses may change. I want to participate in these decisions and assure that they open-minded, thoughtful, made in the best interests of our residents, respect the rights of property owners, and comply with the law.

In thinking about our land-use approval process, I am aware of concerns expressed by property owners and others that the bifurcated process can be cumbersome, time-consuming, and expensive. I therefore looked into how land-use decisions are made in other towns and found that combining planning and zoning into one commission may produce a better outcome. Most Connecticut towns, especially the smaller ones, do this. Joining them creates efficiencies, better coordination, and quicker decision- making. 

Here are [stet] some of what I found:

> Norwalk decided that combining the commissions: “will save considerable time and costs without the need to present requests to both commissions … The union of the planning and zoning commissions also creates a more consistent planning relationship. It gives the commission increased jurisdiction. That broadened authority results in greater consistency in the planning process.” (Norwalk Tomorrow 3/28/22.)

> Essex’s First Selectman, Norm Needleman, stated that, “there had been friction between the two commissions because the Zoning Commission isn’t obligated to implement the Plan of Conservation and Development drawn up by the Planning Commission (CT Examiner 9/18/20)

> Land use attorney Larry Shipman said, “Planning and zoning make sense together because at least you have people on the commission focused on planning issues, so they can become advocates for the plans they develop. . . . I find it easier as an applicant, that a joint commission allows you to accomplish more in less time.”  Shipman also thought that a combined commission would make the Plan of Conservation and Development more effective and functional; because the same people who write it are responsible for implementing it. (CT Examiner 9/18/20)

Some towns like Essex are contemplating going one step further by appointing commissioners rather than electing them. Commissioners will be required to have expertise and experience in land use. We, too, might want to explore this approach.

I am aware of a few arguments against combining the two commissions, principally that the workload will be too great. However, this concern can be addressed by increasing the number of commissioners and delegating appropriate matters to the Land Use Coordinator.

I hope you will support my effort to participate in Old Lyme’s land use decisions; this is just one idea about how we might improve the process.

Sincerely,

Howard Margules,
Old Lyme.

Letter to the Editor: Old Lyme Ice Cream Store’s Closure Prompts Questions on Future Viability of Retail in Town, OL EDC Has a Process to Address Challenge

To the Editor:

The announced closing of the ice cream store on Lyme Street has prompted many expressions of both disappointment, and concern and has even led to a broader based discussion regarding the economic viability of the town’s retail sector. This is very understandable since our town, as well as most others, is facing significant challenges due to a combination of forces. Among these are: the paradigm shift to online shopping, demographic changes, staffing issues, and the threat from  a return of COVID or some other epidemic.

The [Old Lyme] Economic Development Commission, a few years back, adopted a process to address these economic challenges and to provide a systematic approach to reposition our economy for the future. This approach has served as the template for the Halls Road Improvement Committee and is being utilized by the Shoreline Gateway Committee. It can also be potentially adopted to address the future of Lyme Street.

There are five key steps to the process. The first is to draft a consensus-based VISION STATEMENT that clearly articulates the goals and results desired for the area of the town under review, including the extent of economic development the town is comfortable with, and the type of businesses it wishes to attract. CONSENSUS is developed by obtaining input from the residents, businesses,stakeholders and the town’s boards and commissions.

The next step is to generate a MASTER PLAN that details the process needed to actualize the vision statement, and turn the vision statement into reality. It should include input from experts in economic development to ensure the master plan is realistic and doable.

REVISING ZONING REGULATIONS is a key element, and once the master plan is completed, the Zoning Commission should consider revising the zoning regulations in order to conform with the master plan.

IMPLEMENTING the master plan is the final step in the process.

Without an organized systemic approach to economic development, we risk losing additional businesses and not attracting businesses that are inline with the needs and desires of the town’s residents. The success of this process also requires the collaboration of the appropriate boards and commissions as well as the input and leadership from the Board of Selectmen. We do have an overarching Plan of Conservation and Development that is useful as a guideline, but it is very broad and provides no mechanism to create and implement a master plan.

Visit this link to view the Halls Road Improvement Committee’s Q & A  document [scroll down to the third paragraph.] It is a good example of the results achieved by utilizing an economic development process that includes starting with input from multiple sources, obtaining CONSENSUS, creating a VISION STATEMENT, and a MASTER PLAN, seeking ZONING REVISIONS, and IMPLEMENTING the master plan.

Sincerely,

Howard Margules,
Old Lyme.

Letter to the Editor: More Support for ‘Phoebe’s Superhero(ine)s’, Libraries Are an ‘Enormous Force for Good’

To the Editor:

I read Jonathan Wilder’s brilliant letter of support for our library and its staff earlier this morning and my response was, “Why didn’t I say that?” 

Not having said it first, I submit this LTE [Letter to the Editor] as my own corollary to his statements.  

We live on Library Lane and either Christina or I will usually have some reason to stop by the library each day, sometimes just to speak with one of Phoebe’s superhero(ine) team members.

I stopped by yesterday to provide a little encouragement and ask how they were “holding it together”? Before I got to Bob Dylan’s “Desolation Row” or Leonard Cohen’s “Hallelujah,” the librarian “shushed” me and provided some assurance with a quote from one of America’s First Ladies: “When they go low, we go high.” 

In 2005, that same First Lady’s husband said to the ALA [American Library Association]: “The moment we persuade a child, any child, to cross that threshold into a library, we’ve changed their lives forever, and for the better. This is an enormous force for good.” 

Julie and Nikki: keep up the great work!

Sincerely,

Thomas D. Gotowka,
Old Lyme.