A View From My Porch: A Closer Look at ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ (OBBB), Tariff Impacts

Exercise Your Franchise, Cast Your Vote on Nov. 4th

Tom Gotowka

Epigraph: “There’s no such thing as a vote that doesn’t matter
[President Barack Obama. Remarks at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation’s 46th Annual Phoenix Awards.* 09/18/2016.] * The Phoenix Awards recognize significant contributions in literature and social justice within the Black community, with notable distinctions for children’s literature and achievements.

I was editing the final essay in my “Lest we Americans ever forget” series of “Views” just as Old Lyme’s DTC and RTC released their nominations for the upcoming election. 

I decided to postpone  “The Nixon Chronicles” and devote this “View” to CT’s municipal elections; — which are unique this year in that they occur amidst the financial fallout from Trump’s unrestrained vanity tariff war and the societal impacts from the passage and implementation of what he called the “One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB).

Clearly, “beauty lies in the eye of the beholder.” Other descriptors include “cruel” and “harmful,” though I am satisfied with “mean-spirited.”

This “View” is a domestic “lay of the land,” and reflects my observations on what, in my opinion, an unprincipled Republican President, supported by a “look the other way” Republican Congress, can inflict on America. 

The 119th United States Congress has been unwilling to impose even the most fundamental guardrails on the Trump administration. 

I consider the OBBB version that Trump signed into law on July 4, 2025 in the following, and its impacts on both our neediest Americans and education in America. I present what I think are many of the key points of Trump’s OBBB, which was said to be about 1000 pages long, although this précis is considerably shorter.

I also consider the impacts of Trump’s tariffs.

Why it all Matters:

This will all be on my mind this November, and I am certain, may remain there for the 2026 midterm elections, scheduled for Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2026, which will be critical for shaping the makeup of the House of Representatives and the Senate and determining the political landscape of the country for the second half of Trump’s term. 

I. OBBB—By the Numbers:

These are the times that try men’s souls.” 
[Thomas Paine. “The American Crisis.”  The Pennsylvania Journal. 12/19/1776] 

  • OBBB imposes a nearly $1 trillion cut to Medicaid over the next decade, and substantial cuts to education, student loans, nutrition assistance, and green energy programs.
  • Local green energy cuts: On Friday, August 22nd, The Day carried the headline, “Trump halts New London-based Revolution Wind project” Trump indicated that it was a national security issue, but did not say exactly what that issue was. (“need-to-know,” too?)

Senator Blumenthal called the decision to halt work on a fully-permitted project “insane,” and one that would likely be overturned in court.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a respected nonprofit and nonpartisan Washington-based policy group, indicates that “the ‘harmful’ Republican ‘mega bill’ gives huge tax breaks to wealthy individuals, businesses, and large corporations, while leaving behind or raising costs for millions of working families.” 

Incredibly, VP J D Vance referred to OBBB as a “working families’ tax cut” on Aug. 21, 2025 at a speech in Peachtree City, GA. 

  • The Budget Lab at Yale University found that any OBBB tax benefits disappear for all but the wealthiest 10 percent when the rising consumer costs associated with Trump’s tariffs are considered. 
  • OBBB will reduce net federal tax revenues by an estimated $4.5 trillion, largely due to the extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) policies and the new changes in tax credits and deductions.
  • National Debt: The Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation, both non-partisan institutions working for Congress, estimate that the national debt will be increased by $4.1 trillion over the next 10 years. 

In anticipation, OBBB included an increase in the statutory debt limit by $5 trillion, the largest in history; making the bill the most expensive law passed by Congress since the 2012 American Taxpayer Relief Act, which cost $4 trillion and made most of the expiring Bush tax cuts permanent. 

Note that increases in the statutory debt limit require Congressional approval. Economists warn that expanding the national debt can eventually lead to stagnant wages, higher interest rates, rising inflation and a weaker U.S. dollar.

Trump has claimed that his tariffs will bring in so much revenue that they will pay down national debt and fund a “public “dividend.” Unfortunately, Treasury data show that, while substantial, the tariffs fall short of even covering monthly interest costs.

  • A “Positive”: OBBB expands or extends the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, Opportunity Zones, and New Market Tax Credits—which collectively can stimulate economic growth and investment in low-income communities and incentivize developer and investor interest to expanding affordable housing opportunities.

II. OBBB—Impacts on our Neediest Americans: 

    “Threw the Bums A Dime.” [Bob Dylan. (1965) “Like a Rolling Stone.”]

  • Cuts to SNAP: OBBB cuts more than $279 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) over the next decade, which would also affect eligibility for free school meals. The Urban Institute, estimates that 18 million children will lose access to free school meals. SNAP is administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and provides financial assistance to low- and no-income individuals and households for food. (aka “food stamps”)
  • In FY 2024, 42 million Americans received SNAP benefits via an electronic benefits transfer card that enables the purchase of food locally at authorized grocery stores and markets.
  • The program has eligibility requirements, including monthly income and assets limits.
  • Under current federal rules, benefits are paid by the federal government but administered at the state level.  At present, states pay one-half of the cost of administration.
  • Shifting Costs to States: Notably, OBBB begins to shift SNAP costs to the states and requires them to contribute to benefit costs if their payment error rate exceeds 6 percent — the first time states will be responsible for paying a share of SNAP benefits. In addition, states will be required to pay 75 percent of administrative costs, up from the current 50 percent.  (Also see “Impact on CT” below.)
  • In FY 2023, the USDA reported a mean monthly SNAP benefit among all households of $332, where the average household had a monthly net income of $527.
  • Cuts to Medicaid:  As noted above, OBBB makes the largest cuts to Medicaid in the program’s history—a nearly $1 trillion cut over the next decade.
  • Medicaid is a joint federal and state program that, together with the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), provides health coverage to over 77.9 million Americans, including children, pregnant women, parents, seniors, and individuals with disabilities. 
  • Planned Parenthood, or other “essential community providers” that offer abortion care will not receive reimbursement for any provided health service, extending their ban beyond abortions. 
  • Post-OBBB, Medicaid enrollees will face increased administrative hurdles when applying for or renewing coverage.
  • Medicaid Work Requirements: OBBB mandates certain work requirements to maintain eligibility for both Medicaid and SNAP: “Able-bodied adults without dependents will be required to complete 80 hours of work or community service activities per month.” Additionally, the law requires that non-pregnant, non-disabled, childless adults between the ages of 19 and 64 complete at least 80 hours of “community engagement activities” prior to their initial application to be eligible for Medicaid.
  • Note that the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), a respected independent health services research organization, reported that in 2023, 92 percent of non-disabled Medicaid enrollees under the age of 65 were already  employed full- or part-time — largely in lower wage, or hourly jobs in manufacturing, agriculture, and the service or health industries, that either do not offer employer-sponsored health insurance or offer coverage that is unaffordable on limited income. Non-workers include those with caregiving responsibilities, illness, disability, or attending school.
  • Premium tax Credits: OBBB ends the premium tax credit enhancements, which are vital in  making health coverage in the Affordable Care Act marketplace more affordable. Without an extension of this credit enhancement, about 22 million people, including 4 million small business owners, will see their health coverage costs rise sharply.
  • CBPP estimates that 4.2 million people will become uninsured by 2034 as costs rise to unaffordable levels — in some cases quadrupling.

III. Economic Impacts of Trump’s Tariffs:

Fortune referred to tariffs as “the equivalent of a national sales tax that will hobble U.S. economic growth.”

  • Yale estimates that American consumers will face an overall mean effective tariff rate of 18.6 percent, the highest since 1933. 
  • Tariffs are anticipated to increase prices on everyday necessities like clothing, groceries, and electronics; and have a disproportionate impact on lower income Americans who may spend a larger portion of their income on consumer goods.
  • Finally, Yale projects that the price increases from all 2025 tariff actions will result in an average income loss of $4,700 per household.  

IV. Impacts on Education:

As an introduction to this section, wrestling billionaire Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon, asserted in testimony before the House of Representatives that “federal education dollars are wasted on low-income students.” She also claimed that she has the power to defund programs for disabled American children.

  • McMahon was charged by Trump via a March 20 executive order to “facilitate” the Education Department’s closure.
  • Since then, the Department of Education (DOE) has cut half its staff, is withholding nearly $7 billion in grant funding to school districts  for before- and after-school programs, teacher training, services for English language learners and other programs. 
  • Biden’s “Saving on a Valuable Education” (SAVE) plan is ending, and borrowers in SAVE will have to change plans by July 1, 2028, when SAVE will be officially shut down. If they wait, they will see their loans explode with interest.

Beginning July 1, 2026, new loans will be subject to new borrowing limits. Undergraduates won’t see any changes to their loan limits, but there will be significant limits for graduate students and parents using the Parents PLUS program.

Tax Credits for Private Schools K-12 Programs: Starting in 2027, taxpayers who earn up to 300 percent of their area’s median income can donate up to $1,700 in cash or marketable securities to an eligible “scholarship granting organization/ educational non-profit and receive a dollar-for-dollar tax credit.”

The donation would be made in the form of a scholarship for private schools to fund tuition, boarding, books, and other expenses for a student.

The non-refundable credit would be available instead of a charitable contribution deduction. 

States must opt in to the tax credit, so it may not be available everywhere.

Harvard et al: OBBB imposes higher “graduated” taxes and new reporting requirements on certain private post-secondary institutions, based on the value of their “net investment income,” which includes but is not limited to endowment funds.

The Department of the Treasury is directed to promulgate regulations designed to “prevent avoidance of such tax through the restructuring of endowment funds or other arrangements.”

Income-Based Repayment (IBR): In mid-July, without notice to borrowers or Congress, DOE stopped the student loan forgiveness program included in the IBR Plan, a federal program available to those facing financial hardship and designed to make student loan payments more manageable. 

Suspension impacted about 3 million borrowers and reportedly created confusion for those who had made payments for decades and could result in denials of legally mandated relief or unexpected tax bills.

Note that more than 40 million Americans carry federal student loan debt, and the outstanding nationwide balance exceeds $1.7 trillion.

Perhaps by design, Connecticut’s Office of Higher Education announced in mid-August, that the Student Loan Reimbursement Program reopened for applications on Friday, August 15. The program provides up to $5,000 annually and a maximum of $20,000 over four years to eligible applicants. The program has been modified to enable greater access. 

Connecticut Governor Lamontsaid that “We’re proud to reopen the doors to this impactful program. The adjustments made this year reflect our ongoing commitment to supporting those who choose to build their lives and careers right here in our state.”

Fare thee well, Bert, Big Bird, Cookie Monster, Elmo, Ernie, and Kermit: 

On May 1st, Trump signed an executive order instructing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and other federal agencies “to cease Federal funding for NPR and PBS” 

He later posted on social media that the outlets “receive millions from taxpayers to spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as ‘news.’”

V. OBBB Impacts on CT:

In May 2025, 1,086,000 children and adults were enrolled in CT Medicaid (aka HUSKY) programs. 

73 percent of adults were working, with 44 percent full-time. 

Connecticut is projected to spend $11.6 billion on Medicaid this fiscal year, with the federal share accounting for 59% of that.

  • The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) projects that more than 170,000 Connecticut residents could lose Medicaid coverage and another 9,000 who receive subsidized care on the health exchange could lose coverage as premiums increase.
  • Connecticut serves more than 391,000 residents annually through the SNAP, providing $894 million in benefits.
  • As detailed below, Connecticut will be required to pay tens of millions extra to support SNAP benefits, while about 34,000 residents, including children, are at risk of losing assistance.

The actual costs will not be known for months.

  • Connecticut OPM estimates the cost of administering SNAP will be an extra $32 million for CT in FY 2026, and nearly $43 million extra annually starting in FY 2027 because of the shift of administrative costs to the states (see above).
  • Connecticut will also begin to pay for the benefit costs, beginning in October 2027; — up to $130 million annually, by 2029 or 2030, partially because OBBB tightened rules for states with higher “error rates;” i.e., how often they issue SNAP benefits to ineligible households, or how frequently they issue the incorrect amount.
  • The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities projected that more than 170,000 CT residents could lose Medicaid coverage. Another projected 9,000 who receive subsidized care on the health exchange could lose coverage as their premiums increase.

Governor Lamont said that “We’re going to do everything we can to protect the most vulnerable,” “I think that’s sort of a core responsibility we’ve got.”

Connecticut Next steps:

This will be a huge and complicated endeavor for CT’s leadership.

State legislative leaders anticipate convening a late September or October special session to begin to respond to OBBB. Leaders have conceded that most of CT’s adjustments likely will not happen for months. Federal agencies have been slow to provide states with the information required to determine the full fiscal impact.

Author’s Comments: After bearing witness to what is approaching a year of unchecked retribution, I must say that I have not warmed to this President. I am very concerned why he seems to be bound and determined on redistricting in anticipation of the midterms. Redistricting and reapportionment generally take place following the decennial census that is mandated by the Constitution. Consequently, at this moment, I feel that my next “View” might be a primer on redistricting and gerrymandering.

In closing, I do not think that there has been a better time to consider the following axioms, which are not included in “The Naval Officer’s Guide” that I received after my commissioning.: “If you can’t salute the man, salute the rank,” and “the Presidency deserves respect, even when the President does not.”

Respectfully, “May God bless America and may God protect our troops.

Editor’s Note: This is the opinion of Thomas D. Gotowka.

About the Author: Tom Gotowka is a resident of Old Lyme, whose entire adult career has been in healthcare. He will sit on the Navy side at the Army/Navy football game. He always sit on the crimson side at any Harvard/Yale contest. He enjoys reading historic speeches and considers himself a scholar of the period from FDR through JFK. A child of AM Radio, he probably knows the lyrics of every rock and roll or folk song published since 1960. He hopes these experiences give readers a sense of what he believes “qualify” him to write this column.

Sources: “Exercise your franchise and cast your vote on November 4th”:

Carrillo, S. et al. “What the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ will change for students, schools and colleges.” NPR. 07/18/2025.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “By the Numbers: Harmful Republican Megabill Favors the Wealthy and Leaves Millions of Working Families Behind.” 08/01/2025 
Clausing, K. “Three ways the big budget bill fails Americans.” The Peterson Institute for International Economics. 07/02/2025.
Dylan, R. (1965) “Like a Rolling Stone.” [Lyrics] On “Highway 61 Revisited” [LP record]. Santa Monica, CA: Universal Music Publishing Group.
Editors. “Thomas Paine publishes “The American Crisis.” History. 11/13/2009.
Fenster, N. “Trump tariffs will cost average American family $4,700 per year, Yale study says.” CT Insider. 04/12/2025. 
Goldman, R. “What is the “One Big Beautiful Bill” and Its Impact?” League of Women Voters. 07/25/2025
Hanke,S & Tully,S.  “It’s time to unmask the Trump tariffs for what they really are: A giant national sales tax that will hobble U.S. economic growth.” Fortune. 08/26/2025
Hinton,E. & Rudowitz, R. “5 Key Facts About Medicaid Work Requirements. KFF Health News. 02/18/2025 
Jiang, N. “Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill Adds Private School Tax Credit—Here’s How It Works.” Forbes. 07/14/2025.
Manuel, O. “Why Trump’s tariffs may hit low-income households hardest.” NPR. 07/15/2025.
Mascaro, L. “Trump signs executive order directing federal funding cuts to PBS and NPR.” PBS News.05/02/2025.
Minsky, A. “Department of Education Suspends Student Loan Forgiveness Under IBR.” Forbes. 07/21/2025.
Moritz, J. & Spiegel, J. Blumenthal: Trump decision to halt offshore wind project is ‘insane’.” CT Mirror. 08/25/2025.
Office of the Press Secretary. ”Remarks by the President at Congressional Black Caucus Foundation 46th Annual Phoenix Awards Dinner.” [Press Release] The White House. 09/18/2016.
Phaneuf, K. “Federal cutbacks could cost CT food stamp program $180M. CT Mirror. 08/08/2025
Phaneuf, K. “Legislators mull how Conn. should react to One Big Beautiful Bill.” CT Mirror. 08/10/2025.
Price, M. “Vance pitches Trump’s sweeping new law as a ‘working families’ tax cut’ in swing-state Georgia.” AP. 08/21/2025.
Pringle, B. “Trump’s Tax Bill Will Starve Public Schools. Kids are Next.” Time. 08/11/2025
Pringle, E. “In Trump’s year of cost-cutting and efficiency, national debt soars past $37 trillion.”Fortune. 08/13/2025.
Pringle, E. “ Trump says tariffs are going to be enough to pay down national debt. They likely won’t even touch the sides.” Fortune. 08/17/2025.
Schmerle, Z. “Amid Education Department cuts, Trump’s nominee to oversee schools faces lawmakers.” USA Today. 02/13/2025
Schultz, B. “Trump Order Tells Linda McMahon to ‘Facilitate’ Education Department’s Closure.” Education Week. 03/20/2025. 
Sokoloff, N. “What to know about Connecticut’s expanded student loan reimbursement program.” CT Insider. 08/12/2025
Tait, K. “From one millennial to another: If you can’t salute the man, salute the rank.”The Hill. 11/17/2016
Tolbert, J. Understanding the Intersection of Medicaid and Work: An Update.” KFF Heath News. 05/30/2025.
Turner, C. “What borrowers should know about student loan changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill.” NPR. 07/24/2025.
Walrack, J.  “Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Just Raised the Debt Ceiling by $5 Trillion: Here’s Why That Matters to You.” U.S. News & World Report. 08/11/2025
Wehner, P. “The Presidency Deserves Respect—Even When the President Does Not.” The Atlantic. 10/29/2019.
Wheaton, L. et al. “How the Senate Budget Reconciliation SNAP Proposals Will Affect Families in Every US State.” The Urban Institute. 07/02/2025.

A View from My Porch: “Tin Soldiers and Nixon Coming,” Part 2 — A Retrospective on the War in Vietnam.

Tom Gotowka

Epigraph:But little Mouse, you are not alone in proving foresight may be vain. The best laid schemes of mice and men go often askew; and leave us nothing but grief and pain for promised joy.” — N.B., translated from the original Scots dialect.
(Robert Burns: “To A Mouse on turning her up in her nest with the Plough.” November, 1785)

Burns’ “best laid schemes of mice and men” serves as a reminder that, regardless of our preparation, unexpected events can disrupt our best intentions.

Coincidentally, another 18th century dignitary—Anglo-Irish statesman and philosopher—Edmund Burke, said, “Those who don’t know history are destined to repeat it.” Or to put it another way, by acknowledging and learning from the mistakes and successes of our predecessors, we can avoid making the same mistakes and errors.

I examined the predisposing events and actions that triggered the violence against unarmed students at Kent State University by the Ohio National Guard after a weekend of student anti-war protests in my last “View.”

As then noted, Christina and I had attended a program at the Phoebe Griffin Noyes Library on April 29: “Oral History: Kent State, 1970;” presented by Mike Alewitz, who as a student anti-Vietnam War organizer at Kent State University and the University’s chairman of the Student Mobilization Committee Against the War, witnessed the bloodshed that occurred there 55 years ago.

Alewitz is Professor Emeritus of mural painting and street art at CCSU. In 1999, he was named a Millennium Artist by the White House Millennium Council, the National Endowment for the Arts, and the Mid-Atlantic Arts Foundation. He is a now a resident of New London, CT. 

His presentation was very moving and inspired me to re-examine that other very dark period in American history and expand on his observations to assure historic accuracy.

Recognizing our history is especially important now as the President attempts to rewrite or erase important segments of our past.

In January, Trump ordered the Attorney General to shut down the database documenting the criminal charges and convictions of the January 6 rioters in the Department of Justice’s website—which detailed the largest criminal investigation in modern history.

The website enabled access to a searchable repository of all January 6, 2021 cases prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. 

Removal coincided with Trump’s decision to pardon all convicted January 6 defendants and the early release of 14 members of far-right extremist groups, including 10 convicted of seditious conspiracy. 

He instructed the federal courts in Washington to dismiss the more than 300 cases that had not yet been resolved. Trump absurdly said, “These are the hostages.” 

Of course, January 6, 2021 is the day the Capitol was attacked by a violent mob of Trump supporters attempting to overturn his loss to Joe Biden in the 2020 election. 

Amazingly, Trump has also called for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election, repeating his phony claims that the election was tainted with widespread fraud—in his own words, “stolen from him.”

Attorney General, Pam Bondi, has made no public comment on either action.

Trump has also issued several unusual executive orders, which seem to similarly have the goal of re-writing or erasing our history. I will cover executive orders and pardons in an upcoming “View:” ‘A Lesson in Civics,’ Part 2.” 

I consider in this “View” the factors and incidents that led to America’s entry and increased involvement in Vietnam, and the War’s dire outcomes.

I have organized this essay in what I consider important subject areas—so, if you are only scanning, each section is factual and can stand alone. 

You should bear in mind the recent bombings of Iran’s three nuclear facilities by six USAF B2 stealth bombers as you review the comments regarding President Johnson and the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (below). Trump’s order was evidently made without consultation with the Senate. 

I pray that we not enter another Trump vanity war. His administration has already lost America’s allies and jeopardized our economy through his tariff war.

The issues of Presidential overreach and who, in our system of separation of powers and checks and balances, holds the power to wage war will also be included in “A Lesson in Civics, Part 2.”

I. The Vietnam War— The Key Facts:

This brutal and undeclared war began in 1959 as a military campaign launched by North Vietnam against South Vietnam—in essence, a civil war. 

  • The United States entered the War in earnest with “boots on the ground” and “B-52s “in the sky” in 1964—in reaction to North Vietnam’s August 2, 1964 attack on the American destroyer, USS Maddox, which was stationed in in the Gulf of Tonkin in international waters, 28 miles off the coast of North Vietnam. 
  • The U.S. supported the South, while China and Russia supported the North.
  • The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, passed by Congress on August 7, 1964, authorized President Lyndon B. Johnson to escalate U.S. military involvement in Vietnam without a formal declaration of war; indicating a transition from advisory support to active military engagement.
  • 58,220 American soldiers were killed in the war; and 153,303 more were wounded. About 1,700 others were missing in action or prisoners of war.  
  • Extraordinarily, North Vietnam lost 1.1 million soldiers, while 250,000 South Vietnamese soldiers died. Both sides lost more than 2 million civilians. 
  • The United States led a coalition of countries and five other nations committed troops, materiel, and bases; including Clark Air Force Base and the Naval Base at Subic Bay; both in the Philippines.  
  • South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, and the Philippines, altogether, sent nearly 400,000 troops and lost more than 5,000 in combat.
  • Vietnam was the most heavily bombed “theater of operations” in history. Between 1965 and 1975, the United States and its allies dropped more than 7.5 million tons of bombs on North Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia—twice the amount dropped on Europe and Asia during World War II (WW2) in a sustained aerial bombardment campaign known as “Operation Rolling Thunder.”
  • Moreover, U.S. warplanes dumped 20 million gallons of herbicide defoliants (e.g., Agent Orange and others), decimating 5 million acres of forest and 500,000 acres of farmland.
  • Since the ceasefire on January 27, 1973; unexploded bombs and explosive remnants of the war have killed more than 40,000 people in North Vietnam and injured about 60,000 more—many of them children or those simply farming the land. Across the wider region, the death and injury toll exceed 100,000.
  • The Vietnam War is the only American conflict remembered as much for the opposition it sparked at home as for its battlefield victories and losses. 
  • Regrettably, American soldiers returning home from the “never-ending” War often faced scorn. There were no parades or singing: “When Johnny comes marching home again, Hurrah! Hurrah! We’ll give him a hearty welcome then …”

II. Falling Dominoes and Five Administrations:

The “Domino Theory” was espoused in U.S. foreign policy after WW2 when the Soviet Union brought most of the nations of eastern Europe and central Europe into its sphere of influence; and  accordingly, the “fall” of a non-communist state to communism would precipitate the fall of noncommunist governments in neighboring states, each falling like a row of dominos. 

  1. President Truman sent military advisors to Vietnam in 1950 to assist France in the First Indochina War between France and North Vietnam, which declared its independence from French colonial rule in 1945, announcing the formation of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam.  
  • The French finally withdrew from the region in 1954 after an unsuccessful colonialization effort that originated from decisions made in 1857 by Napolean III.
  1. President Eisenhower referenced the “Domino Theory” during a news conference on April 7, 1954, while discussing the threat of communist insurgency in Southeast Asia and to justify our support for a brutal non-communist dictator, Ngo Dinh Diem. 
  • He ordered covert CIA operations in South Vietnam to counter opposition to the regime and increased the budget for South Vietnam from $5 million in 1950 to over $200 million in 1955 (equivalent to $2.5 Billion in 2025); and deployed 900 military advisors to assist in training and tactics.
  1.  President Kennedy authorized sending additional special forces troops and military advisors in May, 1961; and by the end of 1962, there were about 11,000 American troops in South Vietnam—increasing to 16,000 by the end of 1963. 
  2. President Johnson further escalated our involvement after passage of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution; and increased the number of American combat troops to 100,000 in 1965—further expanding to more than a half million in 1968; with swelling opposition and protests at home. 
  • Afterwards, anti-war protestors began assembling day and night outside the White House and marched along the fence, carrying signs and chanting: “Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?”
  • The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was repealed by the Senate on June 24, 1970 in response to growing opposition to the War and concerns over the expansion of presidential war powers.
  • On March 31, 1968, Johnson delivered a televised address to the Nation: “Steps to Limit the War in Vietnam”—closing with the announcement that “I shall not seek, and I will not accept, the nomination of my party for another term as your President.” 
  • The Johnson administration quietly opened peace talks with North Vietnam in Paris on May 12, 1968; hoping to build on his earlier public statements expressing a willingness to negotiate with Hanoi. 
  • However, in 1966, the leader of North Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh, referring to  what he felt was the “Second Indochina War,” declared that he was willing to “make war for 20 years;”  but added that “if the Americans want to make peace, we shall make peace and invite them to afternoon tea.” 
  • The only issue the two sides would agree on during Johnson’s tenure was the shape of the conference table.
  1. Richard M. Nixon took office in January, 1969 after defeating  Johnson’s VP, Hubert Humphrey; campaigning  on a platform of achieving “peace with honor” in Vietnam; and positioning himself as the “law and order” candidate. 
  • Nixon beat Humphrey by less than a percent. George Wallace was also on the ballot as a third-party candidate, nominated by the pro-segregation American Independent Party, which was founded in 1967.
  • Wallace received 13.5 percent of the popular vote and 46 electoral college votes from five southern states. 
  • The election came very close to an outcome where neither Nixon nor Humphrey had gained a majority of the electoral votes—therefore throwing the election to the House of Representatives, where each state delegation would have one vote. 
  • As noted in my last “View,” although pledging to withdraw 150,000 troops, Nixon significantly escalated the War by intensifying bombing campaigns in North Vietnam and sending American troops into Laos and Cambodia. His secret expansion of the War drew immediate condemnation around the world and fierce protests from antiwar activists in the United States, especially on college campuses.

III. Boots on the Ground:

The Vietnam War made the draft system front page news.

  • I am paraphrasing, but Professor Alewitz said that If you were white and had some means at all, you could beat the draft. If you were poor or black, you were in Saigon. Those of privilege were able to find another way out.
  • John Fogerty corroborated Alewitz’s thoughts in his protest song, “Fortunate Son”: “Some folks are born, silver spoon in hand; Lord, don’t they help themselves. It ain’t me, it ain’t me, I ain’t no senator’s son; It ain’t me, it ain’t me; I ain’t no fortunate one.”
  • Ironically, the song was performed by The “U.S. Army Band – ‘Downrange’” during Trump’s vanity military parade on June 14, 2025. Trump has never served in the military, and on February 17, 1972, was classified 4-F (unqualified for military service) because of bone spurs.
  • Fogerty had sent Trump a cease-and-desist notice for using the song during his 2020 presidential campaign.

Also see: https://archive06371.com/2021/06/a-view-from-my-porch-epic-poems-of-folk-and-rock-part-3-the-rock-and-roll-war/

  • Project 100,000 was introduced in 1966 by Robert McNamara, Secretary of Defense under Presidents Kennedy and Johnson—targeting those who would have otherwise been below military medical or cognitive standards—i.e., those with the least ability to avoid the draft via student deferments. “Project” pulled hundreds of thousands of poor men into the War—40 percent of them African American. By the following year, Black soldiers made up 16.3 percent of draftees and 23 percent of Vietnam combat troops, although accounting for only about 11 percent of the civilian population.
  • The National Guard: Professor Alewitz believed that members of the Ohio National Guard had joined the Guard to avoid the draft, i.e., You could serve without going to Vietnam. That changed in September 1965 when the Johnson administration established the Select Reserve Force (SRF), which identified units in the Guard and Army Reserves required to maintain necessary levels in the United States, but released other active-duty units for service overseas.

In January, 1968, the North significantly escalated actions against South Vietnam in one of their largest military campaigns (“The Tet Offensive.”) 

Consequently, on May 13, 1968, 12,234 Army National Guardsmen in 20 units from 17 states were mobilized in preparation for service in the War. Eight units were deployed immediately to Vietnam, and over 7,000 Army Guardsmen served in the war zone.

  • In later wars, National Guard and Reserve units made up 45 percent of the total force sent to Iraq and Afghanistan, and comprised nearly 19 percent of the casualties.
  • The Selective Service announced an end to the military draft on Jan. 27, 1973, coinciding with the signing of the Paris Peace Accords.
  • Television: This was the first televised war. Nightly coverage of the action through the early 1960s relied on information provided by government agencies, press conferences, and official news releases—but then, as the fighting escalated, journalists were given direct and uncensored access to the troops, and news agencies began to rely almost exclusively on journalists with cameramen reporting and filming directly in the field (aka “in country”). 
  • Unlike WW2, there was no federal Committee on Public Information managing the overall portrayal of events, and Network News became a major factor in Americans’ opinion of the war; and coverage included both successes and failures.
  • A particularly stunning report by then 33-year-old CBS News correspondent Morley Safer was broadcast on August 5,1965 on the CBS Evening News with Walter Cronkite. The film showed U.S. Marines torching thatched huts in Cam Ne, using flamethrowers, Zippo lighters, and matches, as shocked villagers stumbled from their homes. The operation burned 150 dwellings, wounded three women, killed one baby, and wounded one Marine. 
  • Few Americans had ever seen U.S. troops act with such brazen cruelty. The coverage “hit like an explosion,” according to Peter Herford, who was then Saigon bureau chief for CBS.
  • Such intense and graphic news reporting resulted in dramatic shifts of public opinion regarding the War, and there is controversy over what effect journalism had on support or opposition to the War, and the decisions that policymakers made.
  • During the Vietnam War, journalists’ film  was flown from the war zone to  Tokyo for developing and editing, and then flown to the United States. Satellite transmission from Tokyo was only used for important news stories.

Author’s Comments: I remember Vietnam War like it was yesterday The War touched the families of close friends—with sons disabled or killed in action. 

I was lucky. I received eight consecutive student deferments, but signed with the Navy during the last 4 years—in exchange for an officer commission and a scholarship with financial support. In exchange, I had active duty and reserves’ service commitments. However, I was never deployed to Vietnam. I served my active duty in a Naval Hospital treating pilots and other flight personnel, who had either returned or were scheduled for future deployment to Vietnam.

My current plan, if Madam Editor agrees, is to complete my “Lest we Americans ever forget” series in my next “View,” The “Nixon chronicles”—an examination of that earlier bizarre President’s tenure, and the events that led to his resignation on August 9, 1974.

I will discuss Nixon’s role in the aftermath of the Vietnam War; his “dirty tricks” and “plumbers” teams, interference in Johnson’s peace initiatives, his “Madman Strategy,” the Watergate Scandal, and the “Paris Peace Accords” negotiated by Henry Kissinger. 

Editor’s Note: This is the opinion of Thomas D. Gotowka.

About the Author: Tom Gotowka is a resident of Old Lyme, whose entire adult career has been in healthcare. He will sit on the Navy side at the Army/Navy football game. He always sit on the crimson side at any Harvard/Yale contest. He enjoys reading historic speeches and considers himself a scholar of the period from FDR through JFK. A child of AM Radio, he probably knows the lyrics of every rock and roll or folk song published since 1960. He hopes these experiences give readers a sense of what he believes “qualify” him to write this column.

Sources: “Tin Soldiers”—Part 2:
Amadeo, K. “Vietnam War Facts, Costs, and Timeline. The Balance.” 09/20/2024.
Ciampaglia, D. “Why Were Vietnam War Vets Treated Poorly When They Returned?” History. 11/08/ 2018
Cohen, M. et al. “Trump commutes sentences of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers leaders as he pardons over 1,000 January 6 US Capitol rioters.” CNN. 01/21/2025.
Editors. “Henry Kissinger begins secret negotiations with the North Vietnamese.” History.  11/16/2009.
Editors. “National Guard: Service in the War on Terror.” Military.com. 12/12/2015.
Fogerty, J. (1969). “Fortunate Son.” [Lyrics] On Creedence Clearwater Revival, “Willy and the Poor Boys” LP.  Berkeley, CA: Fantasy Studios.
Goodwin, G. “Black and White in Vietnam.” NYT. 07/18/2017.
Gotowka, T. “A View from My Porch: “Tin Soldiers and Nixon Coming.” Part 1 — The Shootings at Kent State University.” LymeLine. 03/29/2025.
Gotowka, T. “A View from My Porch: Epic Poems of Folk and Rock Part 3 — The Rock and Roll War.” LymeLine. 06/01/2021.
Guttman, J. “These 5 Nations Joined Forces with the U.S. in Vietnam.” History Net. 05/07/2019.
Hackel, J. “Morley Safer’s coverage of the Vietnam War changed everything.” WGBH The World. 05/20/2016.
Kimball, J. “Nixon’s Nuclear Specter – The Secret Alert of 1969, Madman Diplomacy, and the Vietnam War.” The Wilson Center. 10/08/2015.
Kramer, M. (2009) “Stalin, Soviet Policy, and the Consolidation of a Communist Bloc in Eastern Europe.” CEU Press.
Mitchell, R. “Project 100,000: ‘The Awful US “Meat Grinder’ in Vietnam.” History; Historic Mysteries. 03/18/202.
Norton, T. “Fact Check: Trump Claims 82% of People Believe in ‘Rigged Election’.” Newsweek. 03/04/2024.
O’Sullivan, D. & Polantz, K. “Trump pardoned the January 6 convicts. Now his DOJ is wiping evidence of rioters’ crimes from the internet.” CNN. 01/26/2025.
Walsh, S. “International Guard: How the Vietnam War Changed Guard Service.” NPR Weekend Edition. 04/25/2015.
Walsh, S. “International Guard: How the Vietnam War Changed Guard Service.” NPR Weekend Edition. 04/25/2015.

A View From My Porch: “Tin Soldiers and Nixon Coming.” Part 1 — The Shootings at Kent State University.

Tom Gotowka

Christina and I attended a program at Phoebe Griffin Noyes Library on Tuesday, April 29: “Oral History: Kent State, 1970,” presented by Mike Alewitz, who as a student anti-Vietnam War organizer at Kent State University and a founder and chairman of the University’s Student Mobilization Committee Against the War, witnessed the bloodshed that occurred there on May 4, 1970 — 55 years ago.

Mike is now a New London resident and Professor Emeritus of mural painting and street art at Central Connecticut State University. He was subpoenaed to testify before the Presidential Commission on Campus Unrest. (below)

Mike’s presentation was very moving and triggered fraught memories for Christina and me; and I am certain, for other members of the predominantly “Baby Boomer” audience of about 30 or so.

His remarks motivated me to take a fresh look at that other dark period in American history and expand on his observations. I examine the events and actions that may have precipitated what has often been regarded as the “Kent State massacre” in this “View;” and then consider the factors and incidents that led to America’s entry and increased involvement in Vietnam; and the War’s dire outcomes in a subsequent essay.

And so, these are my “lest we Americans forget ‘Views’.” 

Predisposing Events:

The 1967 March on the Pentagon:

The National Mobilization Committee to End the War, a coalition of anti-war groups organized what was, at that point, the largest antiwar rally ever staged for Saturday, October 21,1967 in Washington, D.C. The event began with more than 100,000 protesters gathered at a rally on the National Mall near the Lincoln Memorial.  

The March was notable for its diverse coalition of participants. This was an ecumenical crowd: white and middle-class, middle-aged, young students, some clergy, and a group of political and social activists; — including Norman Mailer, Benjamin Spock, folk singer Phil Ochs; and counter-cultural figures Jerry Rubin, and Abbie Hoffman, co-founders of the Youth International Party; — i.e., the Yippies; who have been described as a theatrical, anti-authoritarian, and anarchist youth movement of “symbolic politics”.

Near 6 p.m. about 50,000 streamed across the Arlington Memorial Bridge toward the Pentagon. 

There, most remained non-violent; but a smaller segment stormed ahead and scaled or toppled the fences surrounding the Pentagon; forcing their way onto the grounds past military policemen who were standing at 10-foot intervals.  Six hundred and eighty-two demonstrators were arrested.

Note: there is an iconic photograph from the March on the Pentagon (i.e., “flower power”), that shows protester George Harris placing a carnation into the barrel of an M14 rifle held by a soldier of the 503rd Military Police Battalion (Airborne); — taken by Bernie Boston for The Washington Evening Star.

Garden Plot:
The Department of Defense Civil Disturbance Plan (aka GARDEN PLOT) was a wide-ranging U.S. Army and National Guard plan to respond to major domestic civil disturbances within the United States. The plan was developed in the mid-1960s in response to a series of domestic civil disorders and provides Federal military and law enforcement assistance to local governments.

RMN and the Cambodian Incursion:

Richard M. Nixon defeated Hubert Humphrey in 1968; campaigning  on a platform of achieving “peace with honor” in Vietnam; and positioning himself as the “law and order” candidate, who would restore domestic peace and stability amid the protests, riots, and rising crime rates of the 1960s. 

By 1968, there were already over 500,000 American troops on the ground in Vietnam, and more than 31,000 Americans killed. This was the first televised war and television coverage was a major factor in American society ‘s perception of the war. 

He entered office against a backdrop of a well-organized anti-war movement, which he had denounced and demeaned during his campaign. 

In July, 1969 he promised to withdraw 150,000 troops; but despite that pledge, announced on a televised address on April 30, 1970 that American forces had invaded Cambodia after months of intense bombing to disrupt North Vietnamese supply lines 

His secret expansion of the War drew immediate worldwide condemnation and intensified protests by antiwar activists at Kent State and many other college campuses across the United States; with marches, rallies, and clashes with law enforcement.

The Kent State Shootings- Chronology of Events: 

  • On Friday, May1; — the day after Nixon’s announcement, an anti-war rally with about 500 students began late morning on the Commons, a traditional free speech area in the center of the campus. The rally started  peacefully but expanded into the town and escalated into vandalism of storefronts and violence between protesters and the local police force, who eventually succeeded in using tear gas to disperse the crowd from the downtown area; compelling them to move several blocks back to the campus. Additional demonstrations were expected through the weekend. 
  • By Saturday morning, Kent city officials and downtown businesses had received threats and abundant rumors of radical revolutionaries with caches of arms, plots to spike the local water supply with LSD, and of students building tunnels to blow up the town’s main store. 

Kent Mayor, LeRoy Satrom feared that local law enforcement would not be able to handle the anticipated disturbances; and declared a state of emergency. He requested assistance from Ohio Governor Jim Rhodes, who decided to call in the National Guard to occupy the Kent State campus and restore order. The Guard did not arrive until 10 p.m., and by that time, a large demonstration was underway and the boarded-up ROTC building was set afire. 

There were reports that some Kent firemen and police officers were struck by rocks and other objects while attempting to extinguish the blaze. Several fire engine companies were called in because protesters had cut the fire hose. The arsonists were never apprehended.

  • By Sunday morning, 1000 National Guardsmen were on campus. Governor Rhodes had flown in for a press conference at which he said, “We’re up against the strongest, best-trained, militant, revolutionary group that has ever assembled in America; — set on destroying higher education in Ohio.” 

During the day, a small group of students came downtown to help with clean-up efforts.  Mayor Satrom, under pressure from residents and business owners, ordered a curfew. 

Another rally began on the Commons near 8 p.m., and confrontations amongst the Guardsmen and demonstrators escalated. By 8:45 p.m., the Guardsmen had dispersed the crowd with tear gas; but the students reassembled for a sit-in at the busy Kent intersection of Lincoln and Main. 

At 11 p.m., the Guard announced that a curfew had gone into effect and began forcing the students back to their dorms. There were arrests, mostly for curfew violations; at least one student was slightly wounded with a bayonet.

School administrators, with the Governor’s backing, prohibited the rally scheduled for Monday, May 4th. 

  • Early Monday, University officials distributed 12,000 leaflets declaring that the rally event had been canceled. 

Defying the ban, about 2,000 students gathered again on the Commons, with another 1,000 behind them on “Blanket Hill”. A small contingent began ringing the campus’s iron Victory Bell just before noon, marking the start of the rally. A campus security officer, accompanied by three Guardsmen, approached the crowd in a National Guard Jeep, and ordered them to disperse. They were met with stones, curses, and the pealing bell.

At about the same time, more than 100 Guardsmen in gas masks assembled at the base of Blanket Hill. The Guard attempted to disperse the crowd via bullhorn. The protesters again ignored the order, and the Guardsmen began firing tear gas. They were then ordered to march forward up Blanket Hill; — with M-1 rifles “locked and loaded” and bayonets raised; compelling the protesters to move up the slope. 

The Guard crested the hill and started downward. The crowd scattered, many of them towards a nearby parking lot. The Guard following the moving crowd into the nearby practice football field and lobbed tear gas canisters at the demonstrators, who yelled and threw rocks and other debris at them. 

After several minutes, the Guardsmen begin to move back up Blanket Hill, having achieved their objective of clearing the Hill.

At 12:24 p.m., after again reaching the crest, the Guardsmen turned, aimed, and fired into the crowd of unarmed students. Twenty-eight Guardsmen fired 67 rounds over 13 seconds, killing four students and wounding nine others, one of whom suffered permanent paralysis.

Some claimed hearing an order to fire; but in repeated testimony, there was no evidence of an order.

Some said they fired because they were in fear of their lives. However, the students who had been shot by the Guard were from 70 to 495 feet away and were shot in their backs or sides.

Note: there is an iconic Pulitzer Prize winning photograph taken by Kent State photojournalism student John Filo showing teenager, Mary Ann Vecchio, kneeling over the bleeding body of Kent State student, Jeffrey Miller.

The Aftermath:

  • Kent State Administration immediately shut down the campus, and it remained closed for the remainder of the spring semester. 
  • The shootings triggered immediate and massive outrage on campuses around the country and increased participation in the student strike that began on May 1. Ultimately, more than 4 million students participated in organized walk-outs at nearly a thousand universities, colleges, and high schools.
  • All in all, the anti-Vietnam War protests had drastically intensified due to the U.S. invasion of Cambodia, coupled with the Kent State University shootings.
  • Nixon backed down on threats to escalate the War, but concerned that backing down might make him appear weak to the Soviets, called a secret worldwide nuclear alert as a show of force. 
  • On June 13, 1970, President Nixon  established the “President’s Commission on Campus unrest,” which became known as the Scranton Commission after its chairman, former Pennsylvania governor William Scranton. It concluded that “the shootings at Kent State were unjustified;” and said: “Even if the guardsmen faced danger, it was not a danger that called for lethal force. The 67 shots by 28 guardsmen certainly cannot be justified. Apparently, no order to fire was given, and there was inadequate fire control discipline on Blanket Hill. The Kent State tragedy must mark the last time that, as a matter of course, loaded rifles are issued to guardsmen confronting student demonstrators.”
  • The massive demonstrations against the War and the bloodshed at Kent State turned the Nixon White House into a fortress. Two rings of city buses parked bumper to bumper encircled the mansion, and the 82nd Airborne was stationed in the adjacent Executive Office Building. 
  • “If The Government Won’t Stop the War, We’ll Stop the Government.”—The 1971 May Day Protests:
    Woodstock hit the streets in  1971 for  a series of wide-ranging civil disobedience actions in Washington, D.C.; and Nixon responded with force. The protests began on Monday morning, May 3rd and ended on May 5th.

12,000 anti-war demonstrators came to Washington D.C. — the culmination of several weeks of activity in the City. They were met by 5,100 city police and 1,400 National Guard soldiers, with 10,000 more Army and Marine troops held in reserve.

The goal of the protests was to disrupt the functioning of the federal government through nonviolent action; with an immediate focus on snarling traffic to prevent government employees from getting to work on Monday morning. Small groups would block major intersections and bridges; and protesters roamed downtown D.C., dodging huge tear-gas barrages. They created small barricades and left disabled cars in roadways, or temporarily blocked intersections with mobile sit-ins.” 

By Monday night, more than 7,000 protesters had been arrested across the city; 5000 more were arrested on May 2, 4 and 5. Protesters filled jails beyond capacity; and were detained in makeshift open-air prisons and sporting arenas—The Washington Coliseum—the practice field for RFK Stadium.

These represent the largest mass arrests in U.S. history. 

Ultimately, however, only 79 people were convicted of any offence related to the protests.

Members of the Nixon administration would come to view the events as damaging because the government’s response was perceived as violating citizens’ civil rights.

Author’s Comments: The title is derived from the lyrics of the protest song, “Ohio,” which was written by Neil Young and recorded by folk rock supergroup Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young in the immediate aftermath of the Kent State shootings. It became identified as one of the anthems of the anti-Vietnam War movement. In 2010, ‘The Guardian’ described the song as the “greatest protest record and the pinnacle of a very 1960s genre.” The lyrics evoke the turbulent mood of horror, outrage, and shock in the wake of the shootings “Tin soldiers and Nixon coming; this summer, I hear the drumming, four dead in Ohio. Gotta get down to it; soldiers are cutting us down…” (Abridged)

Editor’s Note: This is the opinion of Thomas D. Gotowka.

About the Author: Tom Gotowka is a resident of Old Lyme, whose entire adult career has been in healthcare. He will sit on the Navy side at the Army/Navy football game. He always sit on the crimson side at any Harvard/Yale contest. He enjoys reading historic speeches and considers himself a scholar of the period from FDR through JFK. A child of AM Radio, he probably knows the lyrics of every rock and roll or folk song published since 1960. He hopes these experiences give readers a sense of what he believes “qualify” him to write this column.

Sources: “Tin Soldiers and Nixon Coming”—Part 1:
Amadeo, K. “Vietnam War Facts, Costs, and Timeline. The Balance.” 09/20/2024.
Buhle, P. & Alewitz, M. (2002). ”Insurgent Images.” Monthly Review Press.
Glass, A. “Nixon signals U.S. troop withdrawals from Vietnam, July 25, 1969.” Politico. 07/25/2012.
Johnston, L. “May 4, 1970: A graphic timeline of the Kent State University shooting.” Cleveland. 05/02/2020.
Kimball, J. & Burr, W. “The Movement and the Madman.” PBS.; — American Experience. 03/28/2023.
McFadden, R. “Students Step Up Protests on War.” NYT. 05/09/1970.
National Archives. “Vietnam War U.S. Military Fatal Casualty Statistics.” The Defense Casualty Analysis System.04/29/2008.
Jones, N. Document Friday: “‘Garden Plot:’ The Army’s Emergency Plan to Restore Law and Order” to America.” National Security Archive. 08/12/2011.
Klein, C. “How Nixon’s Presidency Became Increasingly Erratic After Kent State.” History Vault; — This Day in History. 05/04/2020.
Levy, D. “Behind the Anti-War Protests That Swept America in 1968.” Time. 01/19/2018
Lynskey, D. (2010-05-06). “Neil Young’s Ohio – the greatest protest record.” The Guardian. 05/06/2010.
Mailer, N. (1968). “The Armies of the Night.” New American Library.
Pruitt, S. “Kent State Shootings: A Timeline of the Tragedy.” History.05/01/2020.
Rotondi, J. “How Nixon’s Invasion of Cambodia Triggered a Check on Presidential Power.” History This Week. 04/ 27, 2020
Rudin, J. “40 Years After Kent State: Remembering Ohio Gov. James Rhodes.” NPR. 05/03/2010.
Scranton, W. (1970). “The Report of the President’s Commission on Campus Unrest.” U.S. Government Printing Office. 1970.
Smith, D. “How this 1967 Vietnam war protest carried the seeds of American division.” The Guardian. 10/21/2017.
Thomas, C. “Bombing missions of the Vietnam War.” Environmental Systems Research Institute.09/ 25/2017.
Young, N. (1970) “Ohio.” [Lyrics] On “Highway 61 Revisited” [Single 45 rpm record]. NYC: Atlantic Records.

A View From My Porch: A Lesson in Civics, Part 1

Epigraph: “It’s a story they tell in the border country, where Massachusetts joins Vermont and New Hampshire;” “and they say that if you go to his grave and speak loud and clear: ‘Daniel Webster, Daniel Webster!’ “The ground’ll begin to shiver and the trees begin to shake. And after a while you’ll hear a deep voice saying: ‘Neighbor, how stands the Union?’” “Then you better answer ‘the Union stands as she stood, rock-bottomed and copper-sheathed, one and indivisible; — or he’s liable to rear right out of the ground.’” 

(Stephen Vincent Benét: “The Devil and Daniel Webster.” The Saturday Evening Post. 10/24/1936.)

Tom Gotowka

How would you respond to Daniel Webster today?

The Wall Street Journal did so in an editorial published in early April: “Trump Is Trashing America’s Reputation;” which has been, “… built on its ideals and burnished over centuries as “the greatest geopolitical brand ever created.” 

Moreover, legal scholars have decried Trump’s “raft of illegal executive orders and actions, declaring that we are in a constitutional crisis;”— “the President has acted unlawfully and unconstitutionally.” 

This is my first “View” since the inauguration, drafted as the United States approached the end of the first 100 days of what has proven to be an unrestrained, chaotic, and cruel administration that has thrust the United States into a worldwide trade war, destroyed our relationships with longstanding allies, and substantially damaged our economy.

This is a “Ready, Fire, Aim” president, who is either getting terrible advice or acting wholly alone. His vanity tariffs arrived with a big splash and followed by a gradual retreat after they blew up in our collective American faces is a great example.

I devote this “View” to a lesson in Civics, and present a wide review of the historic and Constitutional issues that have emerged in this administration — annotated with relevant verbatim quotes from the Administration.

Part 1 includes an examination of the “Oath of Office for President of the United States,” how and why the Electoral College determines the outcome of presidential elections, the safeguards provided by the Founders in the doctrine of the separation of powers; and issues regarding the free press. I will also solve the mystery of the “swing states,” and discuss why they are so important in presidential elections.

I continue in Part 2 and discuss Presidential executive orders and pardons, attacks on Social Security and Medicaid, and the Veterans’ Administration. Finally, and very importantly, I will also consider the Alien Enemies Act; and the fourteenth, twenty- second, and twenty-fifth amendments to the Constitution.

As you proceed ahead, I want to remind you of a pertinent truism from the 60’s and 70’s. Joni [Mitchell] observed: “Don’t it always seem to go, that you don’t know what you’ve got ’til it’s gone?”

There is also a Dylan corollary, which I pray never becomes relevant: “When you ain’t got nothing, you got nothing to lose.”

As always, this “View” reflects my own thoughts and observations. Any irreverence or cynicism that sneaks by Madam Editor is mine.

Today’s Lesson in Civics:

I frequently refer to the “Founders” in this essay;—they are the  group of late-18th-century American revolutionary leaders who united the thirteen colonies, oversaw the War of Independence, established the United States of America, and created our framework of government  

1.The Oath of Office for President of the United States

This is the pledge or affirmation that the President takes upon assuming office. The wording of the oath is actually specified in Article II, Section One, Clause 8, of the United States Constitution: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” 

A  new president must take the oath before exercising or carrying out any official powers or duties. George Washington swore that same oath at his two inaugurations; the first of which occurred on Thursday, April 30, 1789. Chief Justice John Roberts administered the oath to President-elect Trump on January 20, 2025. Ordinarily, the President-elect has recited the Oath of Office with one hand on a Bible; although the Constitution does not specify that a bible must be used. 

Trump did not place his hand on a bible, although he once used one as a prop in front of St. John’s Church on June 1, 2020 after law enforcement forcibly removed peaceful protesters during the George Floyd protests and had one for sale for $59.99 in 2014 through “Trump Retail.” 

Note that to seek election to the presidency, candidates need only be at least 35 years old, a natural-born citizen, and a resident of the United States for at least 14 years. 

Felons and Elections: The law is harder on voters than presidential candidates; It has been common practice in the United States to make felons ineligible to vote; — in some cases permanently. In some states, felons cannot vote for the leader of their country.

Over the last few decades, the general trend has been toward reinstating the right to vote at some point, although this is a state-by-state policy choice. Vermont and Maine allow all people to vote regardless of felony status, and most states allow all people to vote except for those who are actively incarcerated.

In Connecticut, you lose your right to vote if you are convicted of a felony. People who were incarcerated for felony convictions regain their voting rights immediately after their release; while people who have been convicted of election offenses must complete any terms of probation and parole.

2. Separation of Powers:

The Founders’ experience with the British monarchy informed their belief that assembling governmental powers in a single individual could subject the citizenry to arbitrary and oppressive government action. 

Accordingly, to preserve individual liberties, they sought to ensure that a separate and independent branch of the federal government, framed in the Constitution, would exercise each of the government’s three basic functions: legislative, executive, and judicial.

Although the Constitution does not specifically refer to the principle of separation of powers, it does divide power among three branches: vesting legislative power in Congress; executive power in the President; and judicial power in the Supreme Court and any lower courts created by Congress. 

In addition to this separation of powers, the founders designed a system of checks and balances to block any one branch from grabbing power.

  • As President-elect, Trump gave Senate Republicans a directive, saying on his social media platform: “To all Senate Republicans: “NO DEAL WITH DEMOCRATS TO FAST TRACK NOMINATIONS AT THE END OF THIS CONGRESS.”— “I won the biggest mandate in 129 years. I will make my appointments of Very Qualified People in January when I am sworn in.” However, his margin of victory, measured by the national popular vote, is modest; even when compared with this century’s other close elections. Trump’s margin over Harris seems to have settled at about 1.6 percent; which puts him in 16th place among post-WW2 presidential victories; — just behind Jimmy Carter; — and smaller than any winner since Bush in 2000, when the margin was 0.5 percent. 
  • J.D. Vance wrote on X that “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.” sparking backlash from constitutional law experts, who noted that “the Vice President’s criticism of judicial rulings against the president’s agenda is ignoring the three branched separation of powers integral to the U.S. Constitution.” Vance made his statements following several court-mandated halts on key parts of the Trump administration’s agenda, creating concern that the Trump administration will ignore rulings made by one of the branches of government. 
  • Even more upsetting, Elon Musk, far and away Trump’s top campaign donor and now “special government employee,” called for U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer to be impeached after his ruling early Saturday that temporarily halted DOGE employees’ access to Treasury Department data; “A corrupt judge protecting corruption,” Musk wrote. “He needs to be impeached NOW!”
  • In early April, Trump declared an “economic emergency” to bypass Congress and impose his worldwide “retaliatory tariffs;” — i.e. a 10 percent tariff on nearly all countries and territories, and higher levies for about 60 nations that it says are the “worst” offenders. As  discussed above, his essentially unilateral action precipitated a global trade war, “tanked the stock market, and raised prices for American consumers.
  • “Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) admits she fears retaliation for criticizing the Trump administration and says her fellow GOP colleagues are reluctant to speak out as well.”

Nevertheless, seven Republican senators have signed on to a bipartisan bill that would require Congress to approve President Trump’s tariffs on trading partners; — in supporting the “Trade Review Act of 2025.” Trump has indicated that he will veto the bill.

  • Trump slammed the Supreme Court after the justices temporarily blocked him from deporting Venezuelan immigrants, while declaring that America “cannot give everyone a trial,”— a bedrock constitutional right.  He had previously shipped hundreds of Venezuelan men, without due process, to a notorious torture prison in El Salvador.

3. The Electoral College:

America’s founders were divided on how to pick a president. Some wanted Congress to select the nation’s leader, while others wanted citizens to vote directly. The Electoral College was created as a compromise; in part, to help ensure that the less populous states were equally valued in national elections with the larger more populous states.

  • Per Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution, each state gets one elector for every representative they have in Congress, both senators and members of the House of Representatives.
  • Electors act as representatives for the voters of their state in this “indirect popular election” system;” and so, and awfully simply, when you vote for a candidate, you are not actually voting for a President. Rather, you are informing your state on which candidate you want the state’s electors to pick. There are a total of 538 electoral votes and a candidate must win at least 270 to be elected.
  • The 12th amendment, ratified by the states on June 15, 1804; modified the way in which the president and vice president are elected under the Electoral College system; requiring that electors cast separate votes for president and vice president.
  • In New England, CT has seven electors, MA, eleven; ME, NH, and RI, four each; and Vermont, three. In contrast, California has 54 electors. 
  • In addition, enactment of the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution in 1961 provided the District of Columbia with three electors, and declares that the District can never have more electors than the least-populous state. Forty-eight of the 50 States and the District of Columbia award their electoral votes on a “winner-takes-all basis.” So, for example, all 54 of California’s electoral votes go to the winner of the state election, regardless of the margin of victory.
  • However, Nebraska, and Maine award an electoral vote to the winner of each congressional district. The winner of the statewide vote gets two additional electoral votes. This “Congressional District Method” has been used in Maine since 1972; and Nebraska, since 1996.
  • Remarkably, it is possible to win the national popular vote, but lose in the Electoral College. In the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by 3 million votes, — more than a two percent margin, while Trump won the Electoral College with 304.

This had also occurred in the 2000 presidential election, when Albert Gore Jr. lost the presidency to George W. Bush, though winning the popular vote by just 0.5 percent; — a virtual tie. 2000 was also the year that voters learned about “hanging chads” and how the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision to stop a recount in Florida certainly determined the outcome of the election; handing the presidency to Bush.

  • In 2020, Biden beat the then incumbent Trump by 7 million votes, a margin of more than 4 percent. However, his Electoral College win rested on a slew of narrow victories in several key states.
  • Abolish the Electoral College?
    According to the highly respected Pew Research Center, more than six-in-ten Americans (63 percent) would prefer to see the winner of the presidential election be the individual who wins the most votes.
    Eight-in-ten Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents favor replacing the Electoral College; seeing the winner of the presidential election decided by whoever receives the most votes nationally.
    Most Republicans do not; and prefer maintaining the Electoral College as is. 

Despite the interest, this is not likely to happen anytime soon. Fully overhauling the way the President is selected will require a Constitutional amendment; necessitating the votes of two-thirds of the House of Representatives, two-thirds of the Senate, and three-quarters of the states. Realistically, support of that magnitude is virtually impossible for practically anything in this severely divided United States.

Nevertheless, in mid-December, three progressive Democratic senators unveiled a constitutional amendment to abolish the Electoral College system.

Senators Brian Schatz (Hawaii), Dick Durbin (Illinois), and Peter Welch (Vermont); say “it is time to restore democracy by allowing for the direct election of presidents through the popular vote alone.” Schatz said: “n an election, the person who gets the most votes should win. It’s that simple. “No one’s vote should count for more based on where they live. The Electoral College is outdated and it’s undemocratic. It’s time to end it.”

On December 9, 2024, Trump posted on his social media podium that “The Democrats are fighting hard to get rid of the Popular Vote in future. They want all future Presidential elections to be based exclusively on the Electoral College!”

It is bewildering that he got it so wrong.

In contrast, he had tweeted on election day in 2012 that, “The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy,” and, “This election is a total sham and a travesty. We are not a democracy!” He then encouraged others to, “Fight like hell and stop this great and disgusting injustice! the world is laughing at us.”

4. The Swing States:

Thirty-eight states have consistently voted for the same party since the 2000 presidential election. Thus, it is the twelve states that do not regularly vote along party lines that receive an oversized amount of attention from candidates.

These supposed “swing,” “battleground,” or “purple” states are the highly competitive states that “swing” between the two parties in presidential elections. The group often polls in a similar fashion across presidential election cycles, although factors like changing demographics and turnout can make a traditionally red or blue state turn purple. 

Accordingly, presidential candidates tend to spend more time campaigning in swing states.

John Hudak, former senior fellow at the Brookings Institution has said that “ultimately, these are the states where presidential elections are decided. It is where 75 percent or more of a candidate’s money is spent. On Election Day whoever wins the most swing states ends up becoming president.”

As above, “swing states matter because the U.S. presidential election does not happen by a national vote or a national referendum. The presidential election is fifty individual state races and a race in the District of Columbia.”

5. The Free Press:

The Founders believed a free press to be an essential freedom for a new democratic society. They acknowledged that belief in the first amendment of the Bill of Rights, protecting the right to gather information and report it to others. While at the time of ratification in 1791, the free press addressed newspapers, it now applies to all forms of newsgathering and reporting, independent of medium.

The first amendment protects Americans’ freedoms: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

  • Of course, Trump has repeatedly raged that media outlets like the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, PBS, and NPR are purveyors of “fake news;” and has demanded funding cuts for both the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS),  and National Public Radio (NPR): “for years, American taxpayers have been on the hook for subsidizing NPR and PBS, which he claimed spread radical, ‘woke’ propaganda and trash disguised as ‘news.”
  • Unbelievably, the Associated Press (AP) was banned the White House in February from press briefings and Trump media appearances because of its refusal to “align its editorial standards with President Trump’s executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.”
  • White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, aka Cruella de Vil defended the decision: “If we feel there are lies being pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to hold those lies accountable,” the press secretary responded. “And it is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the Gulf of America, and I’m not sure why news outlets don’t want to call it that but that is what it is.”
  • In early April, U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden, a Trump appointee, ruled that the government cannot retaliate against the AP’s decision not to follow the president’s executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico; and ordered the White House on Tuesday to restore The Associated Press’ full access to cover presidential events.
  • Trump has regularly criticized CBS News and its program “60 Minutes,” calling for severe penalties for the network’s reporting. He is  pursuing a $20 billion defamation lawsuit against CBS, alleging that its editing of an interview with Harris constituted election interference; claiming without evidence that the network altered content to influence the electoral process and support Vice President Kamala Harris. 
  • Recently, he accused “60 Minutes,” of referring to him in a “derogatory and defamatory way” on a nearly weekly basis, and called for the network to be taken off air. Trump said he had watched the show on April 13 and called its reports on Ukraine and Greenland, “two separate but highly inaccurate stories” about him.
  • Historically, the White House has not selected the members of the press pool. Rather, the White House Correspondents Association (WHCA), an independent organization of journalists, has coordinated entry in to the press pool.
  • However, the White House recently took control of deciding which outlets are allowed, usurping the historic role of the WHCA. 

Author’s Comments: My current plan is that “A Lesson in Civics, Parts1 and 2” will be my final “Trump-centric” contributions to LymeLine; although I expect to present a related and dispassionate piece on immigration. In addition, I have promised my eight-year-old grandson, Hunter that I would investigate an issue that has recently been on his mind, — superheroes. He had just finished “Superman Smashes the Klan, a graphic novel; and   We talked a little bit about the book, which he said “was a real scary story; and how cool it would be to have super powers.

Editor’s Note: This is the opinion of Thomas D. Gotowka.

About the Author: Tom Gotowka is a resident of Old Lyme, whose entire adult career has been in healthcare. He will sit on the Navy side at the Army/Navy football game. He always sit on the crimson side at any Harvard/Yale contest. He enjoys reading historic speeches and considers himself a scholar of the period from FDR through JFK. A child of AM Radio, he probably knows the lyrics of every rock and roll or folk song published since 1960. He hopes these experiences give readers a sense of what he believes “qualify” him to write this column.

Sources – A Lesson in Civics- Part 1: 
American Constitution Society. “More than 1,000 Law Scholars Sound Alarm on Constitutional Crisis.” [Press Release]. 02/26/2025
Baker, G. “Trump Is Trashing America’s Reputation.” WSJ. 04/07/2025
Baragona, J. “Trump’s claim that Democrats are ‘fighting hard’ to keep the Electoral College sparks confusion.” The Independent. 12/09/2024.
Bauder, D. “AP wins reinstatement to White House events after judge rules government can’t bar its journalists.” AP. 04/09/2025.
Bauder, D. “President Trump says CBS and ’60 Minutes’ should ‘pay a big price’ for going after him.” AP. 04/13/2025.
Bolton, A, “Senate Democrats push plan to abolish Electoral College.” The Hill. 12/16/2024
Bolton, A. “Trump warns Senate GOP not to fast-track Biden nominees.” The Hill. 12/18/2024.
Bolton, A. “7 GOP senators sign on to bill to check Trump’s trade authority.” The Hill. 04/07/2025.
Bomboy, S. “How Congress delegates its tariff powers to the president.” National Constitution Center. 04/02/2025
Clark, S. “JD Vance Comment Questioning Courts’ Authority Sparks Backlash.” Newsweek.02/10/2025
Commander, A. “Donald Trump Hands Down New Directive to Senate Republicans.” Newsweek.12/17/2024
Dylan, R. (1965) “Like a Rolling Stone.” [Lyrics] On “Highway 61 Revisited” [LP record]. Santa Monica, CA:Universal Music Publishing Group
Goitein, E. “How the President Is Misusing Emergency Powers to Impose Worldwide Tariffs. Brennan Center for Justice. 04/09/2025
Greenfield, J. “How to Finally Abolish the Electoral College.” Politico. 10/29/2024.
Hall, G. “Trump Delivers Blow to CBS: ‘Disguised as News’.”Miami Herald. 04/19/2025.
Hudak, J. “Why are swing states important?” Brookings Institute. 09/28/2016
Kellman, L. “The relationship between the White House and its press corps is time-tested — and can be contentious.” Associated Press. 02/12/2025.
Kiley, J. “Majority of Americans continue to favor moving away from Electoral College.” Pew Research Center. 09/24/2024.
Marquez, A. “Legal experts warn of ‘constitutional crisis’ as JD Vance and Elon Musk question judges’ authority over Trump.” NBC News. 02/09/2025
Mastrangelo, D. “Leavitt defends banning AP from Oval Office over ‘Gulf of America’ stance.” The Hill. 02/1/2025
Mitchell, J. (1970). “Big Yellow Taxi.” [Lyrics] On “Ladies of the Canyon” [LP album]. Burbank, CA: Reprise Records.
Office of Public Affairs. “Justice Department Releases Guide to State Voting Rules That Apply After Criminal Convictions.” [ Press Release Number: 22-542] U.S. Department of Justice. 05/20/2022.
Perez, A. “Trump Attacks the Supreme Court, Says America ‘Cannot Give Everyone a Trial’” Rolling Stone,04/21/2025.
Policinski, G. & Paulson, K. “Freedom of the Press.” Free Speech Center. 04/19/2025.
Reilly,L. “‘60 Minutes’ executive producer resigns, citing a loss of independence in the wake of Trump lawsuit.” CNN.04/22/2025
Rotondi, J. “What Are Swing States and Why Are They Critical in US Elections?” History. 01/03/2024
Diaz, J. “Trump Is the Oldest President to Take the Oath, Again.” NYTimes. 01/20/2025
Parks, M. “Abolishing the Electoral College Would Be More Complicated Than It May Seem.” NPR. 03/22/2019
Tur, K. ‘We are all afraid’: Sen. Murkowski says Republicans fear criticizing Trump.” MSNBC. 04/18/2025.
The White House. “Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Declares National Emergency to Increase our Competitive Edge, Protect our Sovereignty, and Strengthen our National and Economic Security.” [Press Release]. 04/02/2025
The White House. 04/14/2025.“The NPR, PBS Grift Has Ripped Us Off for Too Long.” [Press Release]. 04/14/2025

Letter to the Editor: Bravo and Brava to the Old Lyme Town Band!

To the Editor:

Christina and I spent a date night celebrating the Old Lyme Town Band’s 50th anniversary last night at the LOLHS Performing Arts Center — a musical tour de force.

We were impressed with the versatility and professionalism of the band members, who performed a setlist that ranged from the patriotic to “The Wiz” and a sea shanty.

I look forward to their 75th.

Sincerely,

Thomas D. Gotowka,
Old Lyme.