Lyme Grange Presents Recognition Awards for Long [Decades of] Service 

LYME – Thirteen members of Lyme Grange 147 have earned recognition awards for decades  of service. 

The 129-year-old organization is based in the Hamburg section of Lyme off Rte. 156. 

Grange Secretary Nancy Beebe announced the Long Service awards in a press release dated April 10.

 “To the Grange, ‘long’ means time measured in decades, not mere years, because of its traditions of consistency and continuity in community service,” she said. “We are deeply thankful to their dedication and to their donation of time and skills.” 

The awardees are:

  • Ruth Young, 80 years
  • Alione Cone, 75 years
  • Bruce Stark, 65 years
  • William Narducci, 60 years
  • Dorothie Smith, 60 years
  • Bill Firgelewski, 55 years
  • Charles Monte, 55 years
  • John Andrews, 50 years
  • Shirley Pennala, 50 years
  • Terri Bischoff, 45 years
  • Andrina Monte, 45 years
  • Doreen Lammer, 40 years
  • Ernest Lammer, 40 years. 

The long service awardees have over the years volunteered in a multitude of Grange activities, notably in helping to judge and administrate portions of the annual Hamburg Fair, now in its 122nd year.

News in Brief: Old Lyme Zoning Commission Rejects Controversial Overlay Proposal

OLD LYME – The Zoning Commission on Monday evening voted decisively to quash a proposal intended by its proponents to transform Halls Road over time into a livable, walkable, ‘shoppable’ town center. 

Members of the commission credited vocal opposition evident in the “No Way Overlay” movement and called for engagement from local land use officials and residents in crafting an alternate future for the short span of road between two highway interchanges. 

The vote to deny the application passed 4-1. The lone dissenting vote came from Democrat Mary Jo Nosal.  

The proposal hinged on the creation of a voluntary overlay district on Halls Road that would allow apartments and condominiums to be built above, or behind, ground-floor businesses set close to the street. The underlying commercial district that had allowed for construction of strip malls and mostly one- and two-story businesses over the latter half of the last century would have remained intact for property owners who weren’t interested in adding a residential component to their plans for retail shops, restaurants and offices. 

The overlay district proposal, created by the Halls Road Improvements Committee, was approved by the Old Lyme Board of Selectmen in a 2-1 vote in November. The application to the Zoning Commission was signed by First Selectwoman Martha Shoemaker. 

Shoemaker earlier in the day resisted calls to withdraw the application. She said she would let the zoning process come to its own conclusion.

Zoning Commission member Jane Marsh, in explaining her decision, referenced the final session of a public hearing that concluded last week in front of an audience in the Lyme-Old Lyme High School auditorium that maxed out the room’s 550-person capacity and left upwards of 100 people unable to get in. 

A majority of those in attendance at the time held “Vote No” signs. They spoke about the potential for too many apartments and condominiums – anywhere from 200 to 1,200 of them, depending on who was doing the calculation and which variables were considered – in a location with limited septic options and no public sewer system. They called out a lack of information throughout the years-long process and not enough opportunity for residents to get involved. 

Marsh said she voted against the proposal, “Primarily because of everybody who came to that public hearing.”

Shoemaker after the vote said the Board of Selectmen will discuss how to move forward on improving Halls Road at a meeting over the next few weeks. She said Halls Road Improvements Committee Chairwoman Edie Twining has already expressed interest in working together to plan the next steps.

Twining on Monday night declined to give her own comment. But she referred to an impassioned speech from Zoning Commission member Denise Savageau, who called on members of the Planning Commission, Zoning Commission and other relevant agencies to work together with input from the public – instead of working in “silos” – to come up with a new plan.

Twining could be seen during the meeting taking notes as Savageau spoke.

“Denise was 100% correct,” she said afterward.

Editor’s Notes: i) This story has been updated with a change in the opening sentence.
ii) Full story coming Tuesday.
iii) A reminder of Our Policy on Comments.

Letter to the Editor: Are Old Lyme Residents Being Overtaxed? Demand Answers to Why Town Surplus Fund is so High, How it Impacts Tax Rates

To the Editor:

Are the residents of Old Lyme being overtaxed?  I would bet that most residents probably believe that our property taxes are relatively reasonable compared to other CT towns, but is that really correct? To try and find an answer to that question I Took a look  at the town budget.

Reviewing the budget, the first thing that jumps out is that our “Unassigned Surplus Account” (UAS.) UAS is high. What does that mean and why is it important? Our town’s budget allocates funds for specific purposes. If revenues exceed expenditures that have already been accounted for, the town may assign the excess funds into an account titled an “unassigned surplus”.  Think of it as a “rainy day fund” designated for unusual or unexpected expenditures. Our town’s current  UAS is about 15 million dollars representing about30 % of the town’s total revenue.

Is 30 the right number or Is it excessive? Instead of maintaining a large surplus should the money be returned to the taxpayers in the form of lower taxes in the future or used to fund capital projects or some combination of the two?

How does our UAS compare to other CT towns?  In 2020 The Office of Legislative Research for CT indicated the UAS number for CT. ranged from 0.1% for Stamford to 39.6% for Warren. The state auditors recommend that Connecticut towns aim for a surplus of 16%.

Why is ours on the high side? The reason given for keeping a high UAS is that in case of a catastrophic storm, that either temporarily or permanently wipes out our beach communities, our tax revenues will shrink.  Even if that is correct, it is also true that in those circumstances our services and expenses would likely also decrease. Is it also reasonable to anticipate that FEMA or the state would compensate us for some portion of catastrophic losses? Other shoreline towns like Clinton and Old Saybrook, that have equal or greater risks than Old Lyme, maintain lower UASs. Why? How did the Town of Old Lyme determine that 30% is the optimal percentage? What was the formula or methodology employed to arrive at that number? Old Saybrook has a target of 15%, and if the UAS exceeds that amount, they have a plan in place to reduce it. They don’t let it continuously grow.

I realize the town faces some significant new upcoming capital expenditures, but that does not seem to explain why we have built up this level surplus over the last few years even before these projects were approved.

Alternatively, did the town look at possibly obtaining catastrophe insurance, limited to reimbursement for the loss of  tax revenue, rather allocating millions of dollars to surplus? It might be a more economical solution.

Does a 30% surplus represent fiscal responsibility or irresponsibility? I don’t have the answers, but you may want to demand answers on the level of surplus and its impact on tax rates before deciding if you are being overtaxed.

Sincerely,

Howard Margules,
Old Lyme.

Death Announced of Christine Ann ‘Cookie’ Grem, Her Nursing Career Spanned Continents

OLD LYME – Christine Ann “Cookie” Grem, 68, passed away peacefully on April 13, 2025, in Old Lyme.

Born on January 2, 1957, in New Britain, Christine dedicated her life to the care and well-being of children around the world …

Christine’s nursing career was marked by compassion and global outreach. She traveled extensively on medical missions that took her as far as Africa and Russia …

She is lovingly remembered by her brother William J. Grem III and his wife Joyce of Berlin; her sister Kim Jensen of Berlin; nephews Bill Grem and Matthew Grem of Newington; and niece Ashley Jensen of Berlin …

Editor’s Note: Visit this link to read the full obituary published by Legacy Remembers on Apr. 14, 2025.

Letter to the Editor: First Selectwoman Not Withdrawing Halls Rd. Overlay District Application, Review Process to Continue Per State Regulations at Zoning Meeting Tonight

To the Editor:

An Open Letter to the Residents and Taxpayers of Old Lyme:

During the past few weeks, hundreds of residents have expressed their opinions, both positive and negative, to the Board of Selectmen, the Planning Commission and the Zoning Commission regarding the Halls Road Overlay District (HROD) application. 

As interest in the application has grown, so have questions about the application process. 

I want to take a moment to assure all residents of two things. 

First, the Town of Old Lyme is following the application process that every town in Connecticut is required to follow when it comes to potentially changing zoning regulations. The process is designed so that elected officials on all relevant boards and commissions can review the application in the context of a town’s Plan for Conservation & Development, solicit public input and then make the best decisions for the town. 

Second, everyone’s opinions – whether of concern or support – have been reviewed and carefully considered by the members of the Board of Selectmen, the Planning Commission, the Zoning Commission and the Halls Road Improvement Committee. Public input and feedback are an integral part of the application process. 

After the most recent Zoning Commission meeting on April 9, which was attended by some 550 residents, I have received multiple requests from opponents of the application to withdraw the application from further consideration. 

I am not planning to do that for the two reasons I just mentioned. We are following the required process, and the appropriate boards and commissions are soliciting and considering everyone’s opinions. 

I will also add that, in recent weeks, some of the public comments being made on social media have morphed into personal attacks against the volunteers who have served on the Halls Road Improvements Committee. These comments are unkind and do not relate to the issue. 

As the application process moves forward, I would like to request that everyone be respectful of the dedicated volunteers who give their time and skills to our town, even when and if their opinions may be different from your own. 

Sincerely,

Martha H. Shoemaker,
Old Lyme.

Editor’s Note: The author is the First Selectwoman of Old Lyme.