Tag Archives: Election 2025

Letter to the Editor: Don’t Reelect HROD Advocates Shoemaker, Lampos; Vote Row B

Posted on by

Dear Editor:

The Halls Road Overlay District or HROD was fortunately defeated by the Old Lyme Zoning Commission, but only after the majority of Old Lyme voters and taxpayers made their voices known. The battle cry was: Overlay – NO WAY. Yay!

HROD would have allowed huge buildings for mixed-use housing, retail, and restaurants to be built with multi-story parking garages along the front of Halls Road. The whole scheme was an absurd attempt of a few people to forever alter Old Lyme’s character.

The fact that this proposal ever made it by the Town’s Planning Commission is staggering at best. What is more, the HROD proposal paid no attention to three main problems:

A. Halls Road is a State Road, not a town road and is the alternate traffic route through Old Lyme when I-95 backs up, a common occurrence. Traffic problems would become untenable.

B. There is not sufficient aquifer water for wells along Halls Road to support such development volume. This could lead to water quality issues for existing property owners.

C. There is not sufficient land present on Halls Road to provide adequate septic systems to make such growth feasible. This would lead to sewers being required and where would that take the town?

As a former owner (40%) of the Old Lyme shopping center for 20 years, I am very familiar with the septic situation in the area. Our system, though fragile, worked for many years, but for example, it can accommodate the sewage of only ONE real restaurant and no other major users of wastewater. As owners, we did, over the years, research the possibilities of sewage disposal in the area. Studies indicated the ground would not permit it.

I was shocked to hear of the proposed “overlay” project for so many dwellings along Halls Road in the shopping center. Had they not done their homework? Then, I was even more surprised to discover that two of our “Selectmen” were championing the crazy scheme. Martha Shoemaker and Jim Lampos were elected to “take care of the people of Old Lyme,” not to put them in jeopardy. Now, guilty of either irresponsibility or lack of sound judgment, they are asking the town to reward this incredibly dumb initiative by re-electing them. Go figure!!

This whole initiative was a boondoggle that would only have irreversibly changed Old Lyme and cost the town substantial legal and design study fees.

Don’t re-elect the Advocates of HROD.

Vote Row B this Election.

Bud Canaday,
Old Lyme.

Letter to the Editor: Shoemaker/Lampos Supporters Say ‘If it Isn’t Broken, Don’t Fix It’

Posted on by

To the Editor:

We are writing to express our support for the re-election of the team of Martha Shoemaker and Jim Lampos on November 4th. 

Our Town has been in in good hands during their tenure; and Town services are operating at a high level. 

Old Lyme’s AAA bond rating “reflects the town’s financial stability and ability to manage its debt effectively, with a healthy surplus and manageable long-term liabilities.”

Martha makes herself available in the office and around town. She is willing to meet with residents and listens to their issues or concerns. 

We were very impressed with the coordination of community resources that enabled the Lymes’ Senior Center to continue their programming during the more than a year of construction of the wonderful new facility.

Martha is an educator and serving on the Region 18 BOE. She is not seeking reelection. We feel that those experiences have been essential in acting as a savvy advocate for residents in maintaining our schools’ infrastructure, operating budgets, and recognized quality of education. 

Jim is an author and local historian and is also out in the community; — sometimes acting as a trouble shooter for the more pressing issues.

We will continue to need their compassion and common sense as CT reacts to the massive cuts to Medicaid, support for education, nutrition assistance (SNAP), and school lunch programs that are resulting from Trump’s so called “One Big Beautiful Bill;” — clearly impacting our neediest. 

Governor Lamont said that “We’re going to do everything we can to protect the most vulnerable.” “I think that’s sort of a core responsibility we’ve got.”

While the actual costs will not be known for months or what impacts, if any, will be placed on Old Lyme, it is estimated that CT will be required to pay tens of millions extra in SNAP benefits, alone.

There is opposition. It seems that the local G.O.P. is featuring the defeat of the Halls Rd. project in their campaign. Current third selectwoman, Jude Danenhower Read, and her husband, Zoning Commission candidate, Sloan Danenhower, highlight their roles in spearheading the effort that led to the rejection of the vision for Halls Road, proposed by the all volunteer Halls Road Improvements Committee.

In short, Martha and Jim have served us well and we believe that it is in the Town’s best interest for them to continue in their leadership roles.

Sincerely,

Thomas D. Gotowka,
Christina J. Gotowka,
Old Lyme.

Editor’s Note: i) This letter was updated to correct the headline.
ii) This letter was updated to correct the spelling of Jude Read’s last name.

TOP STORY: Old Lyme Zoning Commission Candidates Respond to Our Questions

Posted on by
1

Hopefuls Weigh in on Halls Road, Regulation Rewrite and Why They’re Right for the Job

Share on Facebook | Share on X | Share on LinkedIn

OLD LYME–With the Zoning Commission deep into the first major rewrite of its regulations in over 15 years, a seat at the five-member table carries more weight than it has in a long time. 

As planners like to say, zoning is destiny. Those three words tell a story that would otherwise take hundreds of pages of local codes—and a stack of maps—to explain: The rules about what we can build, and where we can build it, are the most powerful tool a town has to shape its future.

Recognizing the commission’s critical role in a pivotal year, we invited the candidates to answer four questions. You can find the responses here in their own words. 

This year’s race for a full seat on the Zoning Commission pits current Zoning Commission alternate Michael Fogliano, an unaffiliated candidate endorsed by the Democrats, against former alternate Sloan Danenhower, an unaffiliated candidate running under the Republican banner. The term begins Nov. 18. Incumbent commission member Jane Marsh, R, is running unchallenged for a term beginning in November 2026. 

The candidates responded with a 350-word limit to four questions that we posed. We thank them for responding in a timely fashion and adhering to our rules.

Click on each name below to learn more about them in their own words. 

  1. Why are you running for the Zoning Commission, and what skills or experiences make you the right candidate for that role?
  2. Despite a decade-long effort to create a vision for Halls Road that the community can support, the goal remains out of sight. What do YOU want the future of Halls Road to look like, and what role should the Zoning Commission have in making it happen? 
  3. Old Lyme, like the other municipalities in the state, is being called upon to increase the availability of affordable housing. Do you think Old Lyme needs more diverse housing options, and what part does the Zoning Commission play in ensuring the appropriate amount of residential development in town? 
  4. In order of importance, what do you see as the top three challenges facing the commission over the next five years?

Candidates for Old Lyme Zoning Commission, term beginning 2025

Michael Fogliano (U)

Sloan Danenhower (U)

Candidate for Old Lyme Zoning Commission, term beginning 2026

Jane Marsh (R-incumbent)

Letter to the Editor: Behringer, Linderman, Walsh Support Fiscal Responsibility

Posted on by

To the Editor:

The role of the Board of Finance (BOF) Alternates demands fiscal acumen and community experience. We are fortunate that the Old Lyme Democrats endorsed an exceptional team with an extraordinary balance of municipal knowledge and business expertise: Fred Behringer (Unaffiliated), Diane Linderman (Democrat), and Tom Walsh (Democrat). This slate offers a combined record of fiscal responsibility and collaborative attitudes:

  • Fred Behringer has worked constructively with all BOF members as an alternate member over the past two years. As Chair of the McCurdy-Salisbury Foundation, a former small business owner, scientist and environmentalist, he brings a critical and balanced perspective to the BOF.
  • Diane Linderman is seeking a second term and provides invaluable continuity to the BOF. She possesses a unique understanding of both the municipal and school budget processes – experience that serves the town well.
  • Tom Walsh’s extensive management career with UPS and 11 years of effective CT town committee experience will be a significant asset to the BOF.

Fred, Diane, and Tom are prepared to serve our town with integrity and intelligence. Please join me in supporting this highly qualified team for Board of Finance Alternates on Election Day, Nov. 4.

Sincerely,

Lucinda Hautaniemi ,
Old Lyme.

Letter to the Editor: Vote Kimberly Thompson for Responsible Fiscal Leadership in Old Lyme

Posted on by

To the Editor:

The upcoming election for the Old Lyme Board of Finance is critically important and our town needs proven, sensible leadership to navigate complex financial waters. That is why I wholeheartedly endorse Kimberly Thompson for the Board of Finance (BOF). 

Kim brings four years of valuable experience to the BOF. She stands up for the taxpayer, debates town spending, and looks for sensible investments, prudent planning, accountability, and finding common ground – the exact skills our community needs on the BOF.  Her professional experiences as a researcher in corporate and private business and as a small business owner will continue to serve us well as the Town works to balance progress with retaining our rural beauty and small-town charm. 

Importantly, Kim understands that the Board of Finance’s duty is to evaluate town investments by comparing their importance with the burden placed on taxpayers. This past spring Kim, together with the other Democrats on the BOF, negotiated with recalcitrant Republicans on the board to utilize the high budget surplus to offset the increase in taxes due to the school renovation project. They finally reached agreement on withdrawing $800,000 from surplus, compared to the Republicans’ first offer of $400,000.  

In a climate where municipal finances are becoming increasingly complicated, we cannot afford guesswork. We need Kim’s professional expertise to ensure that our town’s financial health remains strong while maintaining predictable, sustainable taxation.

I urge all Old Lyme voters to cast their ballots for responsible fiscal leadership and elect Kim Thompson on Election Day.

Sincerely,

Sandra Y. Rueb,
Old Lyme