Letter From Paris: A New Spire – and Rooster – Set to Rise Above Notre Dame Cathedral

Nicole Prévost Logan

The spire and the rooster of Notre Dame will soon be back in the sky of Paris. 

The 2019 fire destroyed Notre-Dame’s wooden roof and spire but left the outer structure largely intact. This photo was taken on April 15, 2019 from the Quai de Montebello by Wandrille de Préville.This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

On April 15, 2019, the world watched in horror as the spire of Notre Dame was consumed by flames and finally crumbled down. It left a gaping hole in the cathedral at the center of its vault. 

Four years later, the installation of a tabouret — (literally, a stool) — which, in this case, is a huge wood contraption intended to serve as the base of the new flèche  (or spire), marked the beginning of a crucial stage in the restoration of the church. 

The first flèche (spire) was erected in 1220-30 and removed at the end of the18th century. In 1859, architect Eugène-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc , carried by the revival of medieval art inspired by Romanticism and the publication in 1831 of “Notre Dame de Paris” by Victor Hugo , brought the dilapidated cathedral back to life and rendered it more medieval than before with new features like chimeras and gargoyles. His main creation was the flèche.

By the spring of 2018, the spire was in a state of disrepair. The 12-ft.-tall copper statues of 12 apostles and four evangelists, including a St. Thomas, which was the architect’s self portrait, were lifted by cranes creating something like a ballet in the sky. Scaffolding was put in place at the base of the spire to start the future restoration. It is believed that it was the exact place where the fire originated in April 2019 and spread to the wood frame or forêt under the roofs.   

After heated debates between the world’s architects, engineers and art historians, it was decided to reconstruct the spire identical to its original appearance , including Viollet-le- Duc’s own vision of medieval art.  

After all these years spent stabilizing the structure, putting robots to work to remove debris and toxic lead dust, recreating the stone sculptures, which had exploded under intense heat; reviving the brilliant colors of the stained glass windows; cleaning up the 15th century organ; and stripping walls, columns and 16th century paintings from the dark, slimy layer of dirt accumulated by tens of millions of visitors tramping through the building for centuries, five-star General Jean Louis Georgelin — appointed to oversee the restoration project by the French government — was able to announce, “Now, for the first time, we are starting to rebuild.”

Reconstruction is well underway in 2023 at the Cathedral of Notre Dame. Photo by Sylvia Logan.

TF1, one of the main French TV channels, aired a series of fascinating videos over several days during the week of April 14. Senior international reporter and historian Michel Izard took the viewers through the step by step restoration process of the new flèche, which will soar again into the sky by the end of 2023.

At 40 meters (131 ft.) from the ground, the installation of the tabouret at the intersection of the transept and nave is an impressive piece of work, weighing 80 tons and measuring 15 by 13 meters (49 x 43 ft.) The two beams of solid oak 10 meters long (33 ft.) are placed in the form of a  cross. At the center a poinçon (a tool used to make holes ) will act as the spinal cord of the structure.. 

The installation of the spire was preceded by months of intense work in workshops outside Paris. For this operation, the best know-how and the best trees were required. France is lucky to have both. One thousand trees were selected in the oak forests of Lorraine. Those trees were out of the ordinary for the length of their trunks uninterrupted by branches.

After being felled, the 250-year-old trees had to be “squared” by hand, using an axe. It is a skill transmitted through generations. The few lumberjacks, who still know how to do this type of work are usually foreign. They live in the forest. The video showed a lumberjack from Croatia squaring the trunks in 1985. The Association of Carpenters Without Borders helps preserve the ancient wood-working methods.  

The trees are worked while still green and soft, then dried for a period of one and half years. For the carpenters, working the wood while still alive, is a challenge. Working manually allows them to respect the grain of the wood and know each knot. 

The logs of unusual length of 20 meters (or 60 ft.) had to be processed in special sawmills since very few mills are equipped to accommodate such operations.  

A trial run of assembling the 110 pieces of the tabouret was carried out while they were lying flat on the ground, then that piece was dismantled to be lifted and put together again on top of the transept, at 30 meters (99 ft.) from ground level. This huge object was to be put in place with the precision of a Swiss watch-maker and fitted with specific measurements calculated in millimeters. As previously mentioned, the wood was still “alive” and allowances had to be made on occasion for a few millimeters resistance, since the wood — not being totally dry — could contract   

Around 30 carpenters were selected from among the best in the world. They seemed enthusiastic and proud to work on Notre Dame. “We are going to go much higher,” one of them said with much excitement. Many of them are Compagnons du Devoir et du Tour de France, an élite school of craftsmen, who are taught methods used by generations of artisans going back to the Middle Ages.

The prestige of this school is comparable to the élite Grandes Ecoles. The school used to function in 49 countries but today, it is particularly active in France. The Compagnons learn a trade under a master as apprentices. They share their knowledge by traveling throughout France and live in hostels. In the Middle Ages, they helped build castles and churches. UNESCO wrote their charter.

This view of Notre Dame Cathedral before the devastating fire clearly shows the spire, which was destroyed in the fire and is now being reconstructed. Photo by Robin Garnier on Unsplash.

Carpenters from four different companies from several countries are taking part in the spire’s reconstruction. The video showed carpenters from The Netherlands and England. Hank Silver and Miles Jenners, respectively from Vermont and Massachusetts, were beaming during an interview. They emanated pride for having being selected. They gave up their jobs to come to Paris. Today 1,000 people are working on the Notre Dame site, half of them inside the cathedral.  

Women were also present on the flèche worksite. They variously draw épures  (working draughts), are architects or site supervisors. Women were not accepted in the Compagnons du Devoir until 2005. 

Like their 13th century medieval ancestors,  the carpenters find the pencil and plumb-line their most dependable tools. But they also use oversized tools fabricated especially for this work. They need to use circular saws, mortaiseuses, to create notches, and laser beam to ensure the lines are straight.

Under the tabouret described above, a temporary floor was installed at 26 meters (85 ft.) from ground level. 

It is at 31 meters (102 ft.) under the tabouret, that we find the complex vaulting system, which makes the gothic architecture so unique. The vault arches and rib vaulting rest on four pillars and on pieds de gerbe (sheaf foot) placed on top of each pillar that will support the whole weight of the spire structure.

The skilled grutier (crane driver) does a perilous job when he lifts and carries each stone of the ronde de pierre which supports the vault. The arches meet at the center at the clé de voûte or keystone. A medallion representing the Virgin Mary will again be painted with an azure background dotted with gold stars. 

Similar to the wood cintres (half hangers), which had been custom-made to reinforce the flying buttresses in the early stage of the Notre Dame restoration, four large, custom-made pieces of wood or cintres each weighing one and a half tons were laid at the bottom of the hole left by the collapse of the spire in 2019 in order to reinforce the vaulting arches, which had also collapsed.  

The 320-tons flèche, carved out of solid oak , will soar again into the sky at a height of 96 meters (315 ft.) The intricate framework will be pulled upward by giant beams.  

The Cathedral of Notre Dame de Paris prior to the fire. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.

The viewer of the video is invited to start his or her virtual ascent of the flèche. At 60 meters (197 ft.) one reaches an openwork balcony decorated with floral motives. From there, the view over Paris is breathtaking.

As one continues the virtual ascent, at 89 meters (292 ft.), one reaches a tiny platform big enough to stand with two feet … and free of vertigo. 

The original rooster from the Notre Dame Cathedral s now exhibited at the Cité of Architecture and Patrimoine.
Photo by Nicole Prévost Logan. 

A copper rooster will again be perched on top of a rod and pivot in the wind. This will only be a replica. In 2021, a photo showed chief architect Philippe Villeneuve cradling the damaged rooster rescued from the debris. The original bird is now safe and permanently on display at the Cité de l’Architecture et du Patrimoine, Place du Tocadéro. In 1935, relics of the Holy Cross were placed inside the rooster, as well as relics of St Denis and Ste. Geneviève, patrons of Paris. 

The wood framework of the new spire will be protected from rain by 140 tons of lead. On the video, the workers are shown doing what seems like a very dangerous process when, in a bucket, they mix the lead, which has been melted to a temperature of 320 degrees.

None of the construction of the spire will be shown to the public until completion. Like a rocket about to take off to the moon, the structure will be hidden behind scaffolding.   

The flèche will be completed at the end of 2023.  During that time, work will continue around the cathedral. Light will again pour into the apse choir as the tall windows are reinstalled. The tarp covering the whole structure, like a giant umbrella, will be removed. There will be a last chance to have a close look on the newly-refreshed colors of the rose windows before the scaffolding is dismantled.  

The stone work will return to its original, blonde color. For the first time, one will be able to see a Notre Dame not seen since eight centuries ago.  

The fire at Notre Dame provoked a new awareness of the danger of fires and drastic measures are being taken in 90 French churches to prevent from the danger of fire such as coupe-feu or firewalls, treating charpente or framework under the roofs with fire-resistant products and amplifying the alarm system.  

On April 16, French president Emmanuel Macron climbed up to the tabouret with his wife Brigitte. Two days later, on TV,  he reiterated the  promise made just one day after the fire that the cathedral would be whole again in 2024 .

By comparison, Notre Dame is 96 meters high (315 ft.), much smaller than Cologne cathedral with its 157 meters (515 ft.) spire. The latter’s construction ceased in 1473 and was not finished until 1880. Therefore it remained incomplete during medieval times.

Before the fire, Notre Dame received between 30,000 and 45,000 visitors per day or about 13 million a year – numbers comparable to the Louvre’s. This museum is thinking of capping the numbers of visitors at 30,000 a day.

Food for thought — perhaps it might be a good idea to apply the same rule to the cathedral both to preserve its pristine beauty and also remind the visitors that it is first and foremost a place of prayer and worship.

tor’s Note: This is the opinion of Nicole Prévost Logan.

Nicole Prévost Logan

About the author: Nicole Prévost Logan divides her time between Essex and Paris, spending summers in the former and winters in the latter. She writes an occasional column for us from her Paris home where her topics will include politics, economy, social unrest — mostly in France — but also in other European countries. She also covers a variety of art exhibits and the performing arts in Europe. Logan is the author of ‘Forever on the Road: A Franco-American Family’s Thirty Years in the Foreign Service,’ an autobiography of her life as the wife of an overseas diplomat, who lived in 10 foreign countries on three continents. Her experiences during her foreign service life included being in Lebanon when civil war erupted, excavating a medieval city in Moscow and spending a week under house arrest in Guinea.

Letter From Paris: Anatomy of a Crisis — Retirement Reform in France

Nicole Prévost Logan

A crushing defeat for the French president, many angry people and a country convulsing into chaos. Let’s rewind the video back to early 2023. 

There was a feeling of déjà vu when observing the political and social turmoil going on in France. Once more the “Street” is in an uproar and the deputies in the Assemblée Nationale are fighting like cats and dogs. This time the cause was an attempt  by French President Emmanuel Macron to carry out retirement reform. The prospect of the legal age to retire being raised  from 62 to 64 provoked a storm. It was the cornerstone of Macron’s plan, but also the most controversial.

For an observer from abroad, this situation is almost incomprehensible. Why would the French refuse to retire at 64 when other countries are adapting to demographic changes such as a longer life expectancy and the aging of the population?  

Other French presidents, like Nicolas Sarkozy or Jacques Chirac, have also tried to reform the system but without success. Retirement reform occupied a central place in Macron’s electoral campaign at the outset of his first mandate in 2017. He had a vision of a system of répartitions (contributions), which would be largely complemented by capitalization. It means each individual receives a pension that comes from the capital accumulated in that person’s account.

Macron explained that the repartition system is not tenable financially.  Since this system is based on the principle of an active population paying for retirees,  it works well when the ratio of active population versus retirees is right. The aging of the population puts too much of a burden on the active population. In the 1960s, there were four actively-employed persons for one retiree. In the 1970s, the ratio was three to one. Today that ratio has fallen to 1.7 active persons per retiree. The system is doomed to run eventually into a wall, Macron believes.  

French President Emmanuel Macron.

The state has to make up for the difference since there is an imbalance between the amount of contributions and the pensions to be paid out. The retirement system in France is cumbersome and costly. It represents 14 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which is the second highest in the European Union behind Italy. As a comparison the cost of the retirement in the US is only 7 percent of GDP.

For the French the idea of working two more years is unacceptable. Retirement reform has become an existential confrontation between the government and 65 percent of the population. It also seems ill-timed with the interruption of oil supplies from Russia causing an energy crisis, roaring inflation and an unprecedented drought. 

Retirement reform is, in fact, unattainable because the proposed changes are going much further than just retirement — they are also touching on many other issues such as labor laws, inequality between men and women, insufficient purchasing power for many people unable to make ends meet. 

It also reflects the new way people relate to work after the COVID pandemic. The reform is considered by the left-wing trade unions as unjust.  And on top of all that, add an utter dislike for Macron who has only a 36 percent approval rating at present. 

What are the main points of the reform? 

Eliminate the régimes spéciaux or  “niches” of long-established privileges of certain groups of people

There are 15 régimes spéciaux.  Among them, employees of utility companies like EDF (Electricity) and GDF (natural gas), Paris Opéra and Comédie Française employees,  RATP (Paris subway and bus system ) national police, clerks in notaries offices, members of the Assemblée Nationale and of the Senate, SNCF (railroad) workers, etc. The régimes spéciaux notch a 30 billion Euros deficit each year

Long careers creating a confusing situation

The  government made a number of concessions about the cases of someone who started work at age 19, or of an apprentice, who may have started at a very early age such as 14. It would have been much simpler and saved the government lots of headaches, not to quote a retirement age like 64 but rather set the requirement of 172 quarters (or trimesters), corresponding to 43 years, to qualify for a full pension. This was probably the worst error. They should not have set an age for retirement but just increased the number of years of contributions from 42 to 43. 

Minimum pension and “protection” of stay-at-home mothers

As a rule women make 1/3 less money and consequently, retirement income, compared with men. So an effort was made to add eight quarters of maternity leave and child-rearing leave to the calculation of quarters. The minimum pension will be 1,200 Euros with an additional 100 Euros. It is still pitifully low. With that amount, how can a retiree live? Many have to resort to eating in Restaurants du Coeur, the French version of soup kitchens.  

Raising the low ratio of seniors’ employment

In France, only 56 percent of 55 to 64 years-old or “seniors” are employed, versus 76 percent In Sweden for example. In Denmark, the retirement age is indexed to life expectancy. The number of seniors has doubled in the past 10 years. In that country, one retires when one wants. Danes find that part of their identity is linked to their work. 

The reform is supposed to take place gradually and will not be completed until 2035. There is a grandfather clause for people still employed.  

President Macron put Prime Minister Elizabeth Borne in charge of retirement reform. First she led three months of talks with the Trade Unions, followed by two weeks of debates in the Assemblée Nationale. Day after day the TV showed Borne on the floor of the legislative body, confronting rowdy members of the NUPES (alliance of left wing LFI or La France Insoumise, headed by Jean Luc Mélanchon, the Communist party, the Socialist party, the Europe Ecology party (the Greens or EELV) plus  a couple of smaller partners.)

One of the most vocal and disruptive NUPES deputy is François Ruffin, a school mate of Macron in Amiens. Marine Le Pen, now comfortably sitting at the head of 89 deputies in the National Assembly, is staying above the fray, watching the gesticulations of the deputies. Many commented that it was an appalling spectacle.

The NUPES advanced about 15,000 amendments out of a total of 20,000. It appeared that their objective was, in fact, the obstruction of the whole legislative process, in order to force the government to act by the 49-3 Executive Order. What happened was that, after two weeks, only two of the of the 20 articles of the proposed law had been debated. Article 7 — the most important since it concerned raising the legal retirement age from 62 to 64 — was not even addressed . 

The next stage was intended to be a debate at the Senate. Since the beginning of the Fifth Republic, the 348 member-strong Senate is dominated by right wing parties . They are the Renaissance (the new name of LREM La Republique en Marche ), Les Republicains, and the Union Centriste . It was no surprise that the debates were calmer and even continued during weekends.  

To make sure that the work was completed by the deadline, another article inscribed in the Constitution — 44-3 — helped speed up the debates of the proposed retirement reform. 

While the parliamentary proceedings were going on, the popular anger grew. Seven days of vigorous protest brought out more than one million demonstrators in small and large towns daily. In the crowd, one could see a few young people. Hard to believe that 14-year olds would already be worrying about their retirement benefits set to materialize 50 years down the road.

But marching in the street is not sufficient to get results.

Other tools were used by the unions to exert power such as strikes of public transport (the worse one for the public was on Christmas Eve); targeted power outages (Gerard Larcher, president of the Senate, had his own electricity cut off) for four hours in early March; blockage of refineries; and closing the methane terminals where liquefied natural gas arrives in France. 

The shut-down of the waste incinerators serving the Paris region, and the strike of garbage collectors turned the capital into a disgusting  (and smelly) mess of more than 10,000 tonnes of garbage littering sidewalks and streets. Anne Hidalgo, the Socialist mayor, refused to interfere and help with the waste removal.

Some other countries look at France with envy for being able to fight for the preservation of what they deem essential to their quality of life and to which they are incredibly attached. 

The retirement reform proposal is far from perfect but the French government can hardly afford the luxury of doing nothing. To express an opinion on this most important issue of Macron’s mandate, one should first place it in its societal context.  

The government has been trying to help the population: dozens of small checks have been given to the most vulnerable groups of the population. Students can eat a decent meal for only one euro. Financial assistance is provided for people, who have to use their car to go to work, or can ‘t afford to keep warm in the winter. The cost of electricity is capped so that the boulangers  can continue baking their famous baguettes . These dozens of small checks have added to 43 billion Euros to the national debt. The inflation has been kept in check at 6.5 percent, which is the lowest in Europe. These measures deserve acknowledgement .

One might say that inflation has nothing to do with retirement reform, but it does. The popular anti-Macron surge is greatly due to the fact other economic problems are bundled up with the general resentment caused by retirement reform.

Macron’s government has been criticized for lacking a pedagogical sense in promoting the reform. It is widely accepted that the proposal is utterly confusing. Even a professor at Sciences Po and a researcher at CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique) made that comment about several  of the provisions of the reform. 

The French find the president aloof and distant. 

On Jan. 18, at a time when the reform was the absolute top priority in everybody’s mind, the president decided to take 11 key ministers on an official visit to Spain. Anti-retirement public opinion turned sour. 

In mid March, the president attended environmental conferences in four countries of central Africa. It provoked the same outrage among the population.

Trade unions wanted to meet with the president. This was refused by the Elysées palace. Macron had delegated his authority to the Prime Minister in this matter. This is typical of France — the French keep criticizing Macron but they will not talk to anybody but him

On March 15 , the Senate passed the reform project. The text then went to a commission paritaire of seven deputies and seven senators for approval. 

On the eve of the final and crucial vote scheduled to take place in the Assemblée Nationale on March 16, Prime Minister Borne sounded very confident that the reform would pass with a majority vote. The suspense was still intense though. 

But on March 17, there was a coup de théatre — the government did not have a majority. Several deputies and a handful of “frondeurs” from the Right and the Center voted against the reform. In a deafening noise, Borne had to announce that the government reluctantly had to use Article 49-3.

The reaction was immediate: riots, violence, and destruction of shops, bus stops and more were contained with difficulty by the police. Multiple arrests were made. The Place de la Concorde and the Champs Elysées are now cordoned off by the police..  

This is just the beginning. The future looks bleak. The expected votes of confidence may not succeed, but the task of the Macron’s government going forward seems enormous.

Editor’s Note: This is the opinion of Nicole Prévost Logan.

Nicole Prévost Logan

About the author: Nicole Prévost Logan divides her time between Essex and Paris, spending summers in the former and winters in the latter. She writes an occasional column for us from her Paris home where her topics will include politics, economy, social unrest — mostly in France — but also in other European countries. She also covers a variety of art exhibits and the performing arts in Europe. Logan is the author of ‘Forever on the Road: A Franco-American Family’s Thirty Years in the Foreign Service,’ an autobiography of her life as the wife of an overseas diplomat, who lived in 10 foreign countries on three continents. Her experiences during her foreign service life included being in Lebanon when civil war erupted, excavating a medieval city in Moscow and spending a week under house arrest in Guinea.

Valley/Old Lyme Warriors Defeat GNH 26-14, Advance to Saturday’s Class SS Football State Final

Along with his teammates, senior Nick Cox raises his helmet in celebration of Valley/Old Lyme Warriors’ quarter-final victory

DEEP RIVER —  Sixth-seeded Valley/Old Lyme emerged victorious in a thrilling 26-14 victory over No. 7 seeds Gilbert-Northwestern-Housatonic (GNH) Sunday afternoon in a CIAC Class SS semifinal. The game, played at the Valley Regional High School (VRHS) field, drew a huge crowd of vocal supporters.

Senior Nick Cox, who made some key plays for the Warriors in Sunday’s game, told LymeLine.exclusively by text after the game that he felt, “Amazing after the win.” He added that he was also, “Very proud of our team.” Cox now attends VRHS but previously was a student at Lyme-Old Lyme High School.

Asked why he thought the Warriors had been able to pull off the win, Cox responded that he felt the team was successful primarily, “Because we were well prepared.”

Looking ahead to Saturday’s final, Cox commented, “I’m hoping we’ll be just as prepared [as we were for the semifinal]” but, recognizing all the challenges that accompany a state final, he added realistically, “We know it’ll be the toughest test all year.”

Joel Barlow High School, seeded fifth, defeated top-seeded Cromwell 40-35 in the other semifinal and will face Valley/Old Lyme in the final on Saturday, Dec. 10, at a place and time to be determined.

Visit this link to read a full report of the game by Ned Griffin published Dec. 4, on The Day.com.

Letter to the Editor: Needleman Offers Thanks to Those who Voted for Him … and Against Him

To the Editor:

On November 8, I received the great honor of being elected to represent the 33rd Senate District for a third term in the State Senate. For four years, I have worked tirelessly to advocate for our communities. I know firsthand the significance, gravity and responsibility this position represents. I could not be more proud that my supporters want me to continue this work.

I would like to thank the entire district for its support. Our 12 towns each have different needs and different priorities. It is a welcome challenge to hold this seat for another two years, and I pledge to continue working on issues I find most important as well as issues that benefit our towns. In the last several years, my colleagues and I have worked to bring millions in state support to our towns. I was proud to lead efforts to hold Eversource accountable for its poor response to Tropical Storm Isaias and will continue to work to ensure it lives up to the level of service we deserve, not the level of service it’s currently providing. We need to fight back against inflation and high gas prices where we can and will continue supporting important local programs that benefit thousands of us.

I am thankful for everyone who voted in this election, not only those who voted for me but those who voted against me. No matter how you cast a ballot, the most important part of the political process is exercising your vote, and this was yet another year of high turnouts. The more folks who make their voices heard, the more our electorate reflects the wishes of the public. I pledge to remember the votes of everyone in our district, not just those who voted for me. There are 100,000 of us and every single person matters the same.

Come January, upon the start of a new legislative session, there will be a flurry of activity at the Capitol, with hundreds of bills and concepts ready for consideration. I am excited and ready to represent us – all of us – for another two years. Let’s get to work!

Sincerely,

Norm Needleman,
Essex.

Editor’s Note: The author is the Connecticut State Senator representing the 33rd District, which includes the Town of Lyme, and the First Selectman of Essex.

Op-Ed: Are We a Civilized Country?

Lest we forget … then Selectwoman Mary Jo Nosal  led a group of local citizens including former Old Lyme Selectman, the late Mervin Roberts (in foreground) to Newtown, Conn. to offer Old Lyme’s sympathies in respect of the 26 teachers and students killed Dec. 14, 2012, at Sandy Hook Elementary School. File photo published Dec. 2012.

Editor’s Note: Tom Soboleski of Ivoryton, Conn., submitted a powerful op-ed to LymeLine.com after the Sandy Hook massacre. We published ‘Proposed Path to a Safer Society’ on Dec. 20, 2012. In light of yesterday’s tragic events in Uvalde, Texas, Soboleski contacted us yesterday to ask if we would consider re-publishing it and we immediately agreed. He has added a new introduction.

Are We a Civilized Country?

Eighteen school children murdered in Texas. What kind of society do we live in? What kind of society tolerates school children being slaughtered; not to forget the hundreds of others in Buffalo and numerous other cities? Clearly we are an uncivilized society; one that is disintegrating more by the day.

Ten years ago I wrote the following in reaction Connecticut’s own incomprehensible nightmare.

Nothing has changed. We’ve become numb and routinely tolerate the slaughter of innocents. I stand by every word.

Proposed Path to a Safer Society
(First published on LymeLine.com Dec. 20, 2012)

Sandy Hook School is an earthquake that shakes the soul of human decency. My response:
I acknowledge the right to have a hunting rifle and a pistol for self-defense. The right to self-defense is a root of liberty. Equally important is a coincident right of people who choose not to own a gun: the right to live in a safe and secure society.
This right is an indisputable expectation.
While I realize this is an ideal that will be difficult to fulfill, we must, for the sake of human decency, respect, and compassion, strive to create such a society. To not strive for this goal is disrespectful and inconsiderate to all people who want to live in peace.
My proposal to create an environment that begins to lead our society down this path is as follows:
1. A gun is not sporting equipment. To equate a gun to sports is akin to saying it is no different than a tennis racquet or basketball. This is an insult to humanity. There is no comparison because their designed purposes are so different – fun and games versus a killing implement.
2. Any weapon that is capable of firing multiple rounds in rapid succession should be outlawed to anyone other than military, law enforcement or security personnel. No one in a civil society should have such a weapon, for its sole designed purpose is to kill. For hunting and self-defense, there should be no need for anything more than a single-shot pistol or rifle.
3. Any weapon that uses multiple round magazines or any type of device that loads more than six bullets at a time should be outlawed. Reasons stated in item 2.
4. Anyone caught in possession or ownership of these outlawed weapons and ammunition would be in violation of the law and should be punished with extensive community service or imprisonment.
5. Anyone who currently owns such weapons described in item 2 should be paid to turn them in. They should not be grandfathered.
6. Extensive background checks should apply to 100% of sales in any form for the purchase of legal pistols and rifles.
7. A permit is required to fish. A permit should be required to purchase ammunition.
8. Internet sale of any weapon and ammunition should be illegal.
I urge everyone with a strong opinion on this subject to voice their opinion to their representatives and senators. Time is of the essence. Do not let this moment and these memories fade.