Category Archives: Letters

Letter to the Editor: Hunt is Objective, Careful, Conscientious Decision-maker; After Six Years as Alternate, Elect Him to Old Lyme Board of Assessment Appeals

Posted on by
Reply

To the Editor:

I strongly recommend electing Peter Hunt to a regular position on the Old Lyme Board of Assessment Appeals. What are the qualifications needed for the job? In my view they are fairness, intelligence and thoughtfulness. You will not find anyone who embodies those qualities better then Peter.

Having served six years as an Alternate on the BOAA, Peter is fully familiar with its procedures and protocols. He is also well-versed in the relevant legal principles regarding property assessments and the appeals process. More subtly, he has learned to listen closely to the arguments presented on both sides and to distinguish between fact and fancy.

Peter is now retired from a 42-year career in health care and education. His PhD in clinical psychology makes him particularly well-qualified to be an objective, careful and conscientious decision-maker.

He is a committed contributor to our community in many ways, serving as a director of the Lyme-Old Lyme Food Share Garden and the Lymes’ Youth Service Bureau. He is also a justice of the peace.

Our town will be well served to vote Peter into a regular position on the BOAA on November 7th.

Sincerely,

Joseph G Soucie,
Old Lyme.

Editor’s Note: Peter Hunt is endorsed by the Old Lyme Democrats for election to a four-year term to the Old Lyme Board of Assessment Appeals. 

Letter to the Editor: Vote Republican Row B for ‘Trustworthy Town Stewards’, Who ‘Always Search for Consensus and Compromise’

Posted on by
2

To the Editor:

Did you know? An unprecedented 30% of the Democratic endorsed ticket, 6 candidates on Row A in the upcoming 2023 Old Lyme municipal election are married couples! One of the three couples are running for positions that directly control the town’s purse strings. This roster is from the party that sounds off constantly about diversity and transparency. Let that sink in when you consider your vote.  

In contrast, the Republican ticket offers an array of candidates on Row B that mirrors the broad citizenry of our town. The republicans have presented voters with a team having a variety of party affiliations, who reside in various neighborhoods, and who represent a heterogeneous demographic that offers a true mix of thoughts. Rather than adhering to a party line or philosophy, the folks on Row B welcome a variety of ideas. Rather than marginalizing others of differing opinions, those on Row B appreciate disagreement and always search for a consensus and compromise. On November 7th, will you choose to vote for candidates that will work for you or a team that will work for a single party and platform? Know who you are voting for. Vote for trustworthy town stewards. Vote Row B with confidence. 

Sincerely,

 Bob Antoniac,
Old Lyme.

Letter to the Editor: Elect Fogliano to BOE; She Has Prodigious Talents, Will Maximize Tax Dollars With Common Sense Approach

Posted on by
1

To the Editor:

It is with great confidence that I endorse Susan Fogliano for Board of Education member in the upcoming election. Ms Fogliano has lived in Old Lyme for nearly 32 years and served as a member of our Board of Education for 16 years between 1995 and 2011, and also as Chair of the Board during her tenure. As Board Chairperson, she oversaw completion of a long-term renovation project of all five school buildings, culminating in the passage of the Lyme-Old Lyme High School project.

Susan has been a lifelong advocate for public education and has served for ten years on the Regional Board of Education, as well as on private boards and foundations. Ms. Fogliano has been a full time classroom teacher and substitute teacher as well, and has worked in Madison, Lyme-Old Lyme, East Lyme, and Old Saybrook.

Our school district is and has been among the most highly ranked systems in both the State and the nation.  Ms. Fogliano will use her energy and experience to work in a non-partisan fashion to maintain our excellent school district, using a common sense approach to make the best use of taxpayer dollars. Please join me in support of Susan to allow her to use her prodigious talents to help our students learn and flourish.

Sincerely,

Margaret O’Shea, PhD,
Lyme, CT.

Editor’s Note: The author is the former Principal of Lyme School and the former Director of Curriculum at Lyme/Old Lyme Schools.

Letter to the Editor: Lyme Voters Should Elect Lodge to BOE; Committed, Involved in Community, Cognizant of Balance Between Quality Education and its Cost

Posted on by
Reply

To the Editor:

What is necessary to qualify a person to hold an elected office in a town?

Plenty of information is circulated about the candidates at the top of the ballot, but as you go down, much less information is available. How do voters make decisions on whom to vote for?

The foremost prerequisite is commitment and involvement in service to the community. Have they done that? Have they had a wide range of life experiences? Are they creative? Is the candidate a pleasant, hard-working person who can work well with others?   

Gavin Lodge, Democratic candidate for Board of Education of Lyme (and Old Lyme), possesses all these qualifications. He has founded his own business and is the executive director of 4A Arts—American Alliance of Artists and Audiences—a non-profit national arts advocacy organization. As an active participant in his children’s school lives, he was a PTA president and chaired a school on-line Auction Committee that raised $53,000.

One of the best reasons to vote for Gavin is that, as a devoted father and concerned taxpayer, he is well aware of the delicate balance between a quality education and the cost of education.

Lyme voters should vote for Gavin Lodge.   

Sincerely,                                         

Phyllis Ross,
Lyme, CT.

Letter to the Editor: Misinformation Abounds About Halls Rd. Improvement Project, Clarifications Offered

Posted on by
1

To the Editor:

Local Republicans seem to have been spreading misinformation about the Halls Road Improvements plan during their door-knocking and social media campaigns. 

The most common misstatements are the following.

1.  Misstatement:  The Halls Road Overlay District (HROD) proposal will raise our taxes.
Fact:  If HROD is passed developers will be able to get greater returns on their property with mixed use projects. With this development the town’s tax revenues will increase and reduce the share the rest of us must pay.

2. Misstatement:  The Halls Road Overlay District (HROD) proposal will require property owners to implement changes. 
Fact:  Adopting the provisions of the HROD is purely optional.  If the property owner doesn’t opt-in, the existing C30-s zoning regulations continue to apply.

3.  Misstatement:  The Halls Road project was developed and supported only by Democrats. 
Fact:  The Halls Road Master Plan has been approved and supported by the bi-partisan [Old Lyme] Board of Selectmen and Board of Finance. The request for changes to Halls Road District was supported by 80% of the respondents to a survey conducted in 2020 by Advance CT for the Old Lyme Economic Development Commission.

4. Misstatement:  Old Lyme residents will have to pay a fortune for the bridge and trails project.
Fact: The design for the bridge and trails is fully funded by grants. Any future construction will only take place if grants are secured to help fund it.  Additionally, funding and approval for sidewalks along Halls Road were applied for through CT DOT in 2022. We are in the DOT queue for review, approval and funding.

Halls Road is important to Old Lyme’s future — too important to use as a political football. We need to work together. The least we can do is make our choices based on real facts, not rumors and misinformation.

Sincerely,

Howard Margules,
Old Lyme.