UPDATED: Early Voters In CT Top 170,000, With Just Over 2,000 from Lyme and Old Lyme

Lyme Republican Registrar of Voters Judith Davies (right) and Democratic Moderator Mary Stone work an 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. schedule on Tuesday, Oct. 28.

Editor’s Note: This story was first published on Nov. 3 as a Staff Report by CT News Junkie, and is republished here with their permission. The Lyme and Old Lyme data has been added by Elizabeth Regan.

Before polls opened this morning for Election Day, more than 170,000 Connecticut residents had already cast a ballot.

That includes 1,553 early voters in Old Lyme and 530 in Lyme, according to local voting officials.

Data from Secretary of the State Stephanie Thomas’ office shows voters also returned more than 20,000 absentee ballots, which will be counted today. 

In Old Lyme, Deputy Registrar of Voters Katherine Thuma said turnout over the 14-day early voting period consisted of 675 Democrats, 461 unaffiliated voters, 402 Republicans and 15 minor party voters. That’s compared to total registered voters as of Tuesday that totaled 2,546 unaffiliated voters, 1,963 Democrats, 1,644 Republicans and 97 minor party voters.

By mid-day Tuesday, Thuma said 155 absentee ballots had been processed.

Lyme Registrar of Voters Judith Davies and Dottie Wells said early voting brought in 253 Democrats, 165 unaffiliated voters, 103 Republicans and 9 minor party voters. While a breakdown of the affiliations of all registered voters wasn’t immediately available on Tuesday, data from Thomas’ office as of Oct. 17 shows there were 734 unaffiliated voters, 717 Democrats, 444 Republicans and 31 minor party voters.

Wells said 31 absentee ballots had been received as of Monday.

Of the 170,920 early voters to cast a ballot as of Nov. 2, 83,479 are registered Democrats, and 36,525 are Republicans. Another 48,830 are not affiliated with either party and 2,085 are classified as “other,” Thomas’ office said.

Of the 20,197 absentee ballots, Democrats returned 10,277 and Republicans 4,402 with 5,299 unaffiliated and 219 others.

These totals are audited throughout the early voting period, according to Thomas’ office.

Stratford, driven by a contentious mayor’s race, continues to lead the way with 4,743 early voters, followed by Milford with 4,414, Greenwich with 3,706 and Hamden with 3,679. Trumbull (3,616) rounded out the top 5. The rest of the 10 top early voting communities were Norwalk (3,481), Fairfield (3,410), West Hartford (3,057), Stamford (2,771), and Bristol (2,744).

Last year, in a presidential election year, nearly 750,000 voters took advantage of early voting to cast a ballot. That represented just under a third of Connecticut’s 2.3 million registered voters.

Editor’s Note: This article was updated with early voting and voter registration totals from Old Lyme voting officials and again with additional Lyme numbers.

Letter to the Editor: Attendance Records for Old Lyme Board of Finance Candidates Thompson, Kelsey Differ Sharply

To the Editor:

We live in a representative democracy and this November you are being charged with electing fellow Old Lyme residents to be your representatives on local boards and commissions. One of the most basic things you should expect from your representatives is that they show up, at least most of the time, so that they can understand the issues and represent your interests. We do have alternates for many of our boards who step in when a regular member is ill or has some other unavoidable conflict. However, there are issues that carry over multiple meetings and repeated absences can lead to representatives making decisions without having all important information.

This is extremely relevant in this year’s Board of Finance race. Kimberly Thompson, the Democratic candidate, has served on this board since November 2021. Since being sworn in to her seat, Kim has only missed one meeting. Since January 2024, one of her opponents, J. David Kelsey, has missed 12 meetings, constituting about 35% of the total.  Five of these missed meetings have been in 2025 and, as of this writing, David has not been seen at the Board of Finance since June. To earn your vote, members should show up for Old Lyme. Please join me in voting for Kimberly Thompson on November 4 for a full Board of Finance seat.

Sincerely,

Leanne Viola,
Old Lyme.

Letter to the Editor: Former First Selectman Griswold Endorses Mesham, Read for Old Lyme Board of Selectmen

To the Editor:

Having served as your First Selectman for 18 years, as member of the Board of Finance for 15 years and currently as a member of the Board of Assessment Appeals for 12 years, I am proud to whole heartedly endorse John Mesham to be our next First Selectman and Jude Read to continue as our Selectwoman. Both John and Jude are extremely well qualified to lead our Town.

John has been deeply involved in our community for decades as a State Police Officer, a Boy Scout Leader, a member of the Inland Wetlands Commission and a Deputy Registrar of Voters.  He and his wife Nancy have resided in Old Lyme for 31 years and their three children have graduated from our outstanding Lyme/Old Lyme schools. John is a proven leader and manager and he is a person of impeccable integrity. John has been a key leader in supporting the Town’s right to access our Tantummaheag Landing, a leader in the fight to stop the HROD debacle, and played a vital role in bringing Town commissions together to oversee the Horseneck Creek Open Space parcel. John has significant supervisory and management experience of multiple state police barracks and personnel. His responsibilities included day-to-day management and oversight of over 100 people. This included scheduling, performance reviews, facilities management, vehicle assignments and upkeep, and a multitude of reporting requirements.  John was also a local police union president with collective bargaining and negotiating experience. John knows how to manage people and is dedicated to supporting the needs and wishes of the majority of Old Lyme’s citizens.  These skills and attributes make John the ideal First Selectman choice for Old Lyme in November.

Jude has resided in Old Lyme for 43 years, along with her husband, Sloan Danenhower, and both of their children graduated from our Lyme/Old Lyme schools.  Jude has owned several small business and she is currently a business management consultant.  She is deeply involved in Old Lyme, both politically and with local non-profits.  She currently serves as one of the three members of the Old Lyme Board of Selectmen.  She also served on the Board of Finance and the Lyme/Old Lyme Board of Education. She is a member and past Treasurer of the MacCurdy Salisbury Educational Foundation and has been a Board member of the Old Lyme Historical Society.  She has been affiliated with the Girl Scouts and the Lymes’ Senior Center Meals on Wheels program.

John and Jude are willing and able to serve as our First Selectman and Selectwoman and they have excellent credentials to do so.

Please join me in voting for John Mesham as our First Selectman and Jude Read as our Selectwoman in the upcoming municipal election and please encourage your family and friends to do the same.

Sincerely,

Timothy Griswold,
Old Lyme.

Editor’s Note: The author is a candidate for the Old Lyme Board of Assessment Appeals in the upcoming election.

TOP STORY: ‘It Matters That You Vote’: Lyme Residents Turn Out Early for Familiar Election Day Ritual

Democratic Registrar of Voters Dottie Wells checks in voters during early voting in Lyme Town Hall on Tuesday, Oct. 28.

LYME, CT—Resident Michael Tuccio was among a small surge of Wednesday afternoon voters, who came through the typically quiet voting area set up in Lyme Town Hall’s main meeting room since Oct. 20. 

By the time he got there, election officials said voters had cast 335 ballots as part of the two-week early voting period. Combined with 31 absentee ballots, that amounts to about 19% of the town’s 1,932 registered voters. 

Tuccio said casting a ballot through the early voting process, which was instituted last year to give voters two weeks to vote prior to Election Day, is not notably different from voting on Election Day. 

Last year’s presidential election saw 497 early votes in total, according to data from the Office of the Secretary of the State. 

“It’s just kind of normal,” he said, comparing this year to a lifetime of voting that he considers everyone’s civic duty. 

The continuity is important to Tuccio, who said his preference is for things to stay the same. That’s why he said he supports candidates, who will reject residential development in the face of state efforts to promote affordable housing. 

“I’m just staunchly opposed to change in general,” he said. 

That’s not to say there aren’t procedural differences when it comes to voting early. 

As part of the mid afternoon burst of activity, Tuccio and the other voters checked in with Democratic Registrar of Voters Dottie Wells to receive a ballot and an envelope. 

The line grew to include several people at times during the two o’clock hour. It was a change from the slower and more sporadic trickle that had dominated early voting for the prior eight days. 

“We’re getting a little rush here,” Wells said. “This is very exciting.” 

Each voter was directed to one of the privacy booths to fill out the ballot envelope, seal it and sign it before handing it to Republican Registrar of Voters Judith Davies to be scanned into the system. Voters were instructed to drop the envelopes in the holding box, where they would remain until being transported to the town clerk’s vault at the end of the day.

Republican Registrar of Voters Judith Davies (right) and Democratic Moderator Mary Stone await the next early voter in Lyme Town Hall.

Davies described “an elaborate process” for getting the ballots to the town clerk that includes both registrars to ensure the proper chain of custody. The ballots stay in the vault until Election Day, when they will be counted by poll workers from both parties in the same process used for absentee ballots. 

Davies, a 7-year registrar of voters, and Wells, who’s been in the role for 2.5 years, each work 12 of the 14-day early voting schedule. The days run from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. through Nov. 2, except for two elongated 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. shifts. One of those extended shifts was Wednesday; the next is Thursday. 

Davies said the three-person shifts include both registrars – or an assistant registrar if Wells or Davies have the day off – and one moderator.  Registrars make an hourly rate of $22, while moderators and poll workers make about $17. 

“It’s long hours, but we’re happy to be here because obviously voting is important,” she said. 

She credited a team of 15 poll workers, including four moderators, for making the job an enjoyable experience from early voting through Election Day. The team consists of experienced workers as well as new additions this year. 

Davies counted weekends as the slowest period, with 22 voters on Saturday and 16 on Sunday. She said poll workers sometimes read or knit during down time that can extend to an hour at times. 

Moderator Mary Stone is scheduled for six days of early voting. She said it’s been good to see the turnout from voters, who are grateful for the opportunity to vote early – and to more easily find a place to park at the Town Hall. 

“By and large, they’re overwhelmingly appreciative,” she said. “They appreciate avoiding the crowds on Election Day.”

For Tuccio, Wednesday afternoon was a convenient day to vote on his way home from work. He saw others, who found early voting convenient because the less hectic pace suits their age or level of mobility. 

He said the extended calendar enhances the experience for voters.

The U.S. Marine Corps veteran counted liberty as one of his guiding principles. 

It doesn’t matter who you vote for, according to Tuccio – “it matters that you vote.”

Deadline for Receipt of Election-Related ‘Letters to the Editor’ Has Passed

LYME/OLD LYME–The deadline to receive election-related letters to be considered for publication is noon on Wednesday, Oct. 29. Letters received before that deadline, which are selected for publication, will be published on or before midnight on Saturday, Nov. 1, assuming we can obtain timely confirmation of the letters authenticity.

Letters received after noon on Wednesday, Oct. 29, will not be considered for publication, unless they are in direct response to a letter published on or before noon on Oct. 29. The letter to which the response is being made must be cited. Response letters selected for publication will be published by midnight on Saturday, Nov. 1, again assuming we can obtain timely confirmation of the letters authenticity.

No new letters will be published on Sunday, Nov. 2, or Monday, Nov. 3.

Here is a reminder of our Policy on Letters to the Editor.

Editor’s Note: The deadlines have been changed to allow us to publish a full summary of all election-related articles, letters and op-eds next Sunday.