
Bonnie Reemsnyder
We’re delighted to publish today the latest newsletter written by Old Lyme’s First Selectwoman Bonnie Reemsnyder.
Newsletter from the First Selectwoman April 2013

Bonnie Reemsnyder
We’re delighted to publish today the latest newsletter written by Old Lyme’s First Selectwoman Bonnie Reemsnyder.
Newsletter from the First Selectwoman April 2013
Senator Linares extends a greeting at lunch for seniors in Old Saybrook
State Senator Art Linares joined a well-attended lunch on Thursday, April 25, at the Estuary Council of Seniors at 200 Main Street in Old Saybrook. The Senator, whose district includes Lyme, Chester, Deep River, Essex, Westbrook and parts of Old Saybrook, as well as six other Connecticut towns, did not deliver a formal address at the lunch.
Rather, the 24-year-old state legislator sat at a table with a group of seniors for his lunch and, after a brief greeting to all, he circulated around the dining hall shaking hands and engaging in small talk with diners. In all, there were close to 100 seniors attending the lunch. The cost per person for an Estuary lunch is $3.
Linares’s ‘No’ Vote on the New Gun Control Law
After the lunch, the Senator consented to a discussion of his views on the state’s new gun control law. The law was recently passed by the state legislature and signed into law by the Governor. Linares cast his “no” vote on the gun control bill in the State Senate.
Asked to give his reasons for voting against gun control bill, the Senator said, “The legislation outlaws 100 kinds of guns.” He continued, “Most guns are used for self-defense,” and citizens should have, “… the freedom to defend themselves.”
Continuing, he said, the new law, by imposing so many restrictions on the ownership of guns, “could create a black market” in the sale of guns. He also opined that taking away guns from common citizens could have the effect of being “dangerous to law enforcement officers.” He said, “My concern is the police officers.”
In addition, the Senator stressed that the new gun law bill was moving so fast through the state legislature, “I did not have a chance to read the bill.” Summing up his position, the first term Senator said that the state’s new gun control law “went too far and was too extreme.” He also said that he had heard that, “they are confiscating guns” from private citizens, although he gave no specifics.
Representative Giuliano Voted “No” on New Gun Law
In discussing his “no” vote on gun control legislation, the Senator said that a number of other local legislators had voted against the bill. He mentioned, specifically, State Representative Marilyn Giuliano, who voted “no” on the gun control bill in the House of Representatives. Giuliano represents the towns of Lyme, Old Lyme and Old Saybrook, and she is the Assistant Republican Leader of the lower House of the legislature.
To The Editor:
I write to thank LymeLine, ValleyNewsNow and OldSaybrookNow for their coverage of Senator Linares’s recent vote against the gun control law enacted by the Connecticut Legislature with broad bipartisan support following the Newtown massacre.
Mr. Linares’s constituents have a right to know the reasons for his opposition, given the undeniable support in his district for child safety, the strong endorsement of the bill across party lines, and the uncertainty as to what credible alternative Mr. Linares is offering.
However, while the coverage of Senator Linares’s “no” vote is helpful, it was not altogether satisfying. The article reports that Mr. Linares issued a statement which “concluded the bill does not address the most important problems”. But it does not tell us how Mr. Linares reached that conclusion or what measures he would advocate instead.
Senator Linares reportedly said that he decided to vote against the gun law “after talking to many residents of the 33rd district”. If Mr. Linares means to suggest that his vote reflects the majority of his constituents’ views, I would guess that claim is almost certainly preposterous. To my knowledge, Mr. Linares never conducted a hearing on the issue in his district, and the extensive testimony he heard as a member of the Newtown Task Force led other legislators to broad bipartisan support for the measure. The true basis of Mr. Linares’s position remains a mystery.
Mr. Linares’s official website sheds no light on the matter either. As of today, April 19 – over two weeks after the bill’s enactment – Mr. Linares’s web site does not even mention his vote, let alone carry the statement described by the Valley News. Instead, when one consults the web site’s “in the news” section, one learns that in the aftermath of the legislation, Mr. Linares spent his time commending kindergartners for helping others, extolling the Haddam Shad Museum, and “high fiving” intermediate school students on tour of the State capitol.
One need not begrudge Senator Linares his “feel good” press releases or his energetic attempts to have them covered in the local press, no matter how modest the content. (See, for example, the 10 or so articles appearing in ValleyNewsNow since mid January extensively covering among other things Mr. Linares participation in various meetings, his tours of local factories, and even his attendance at someone else’s press conference) But they are not a substitute for keeping his district informed of what he is actually doing in Hartford and why.
The public’s right to know our representatives positions is not a partisan issue. It applies left, right and center. Again, the Newtown legislation is being cited as a model of bipartisan cooperation worthy of emulation at the national level. Residents of the 33rd District, whether they be Republican, Democrats, or Independents, deserve to understand why Mr. Linares took an outlier position on this historic legislation
Sincerely,
David Harfst,
Essex.
A summary of the provisions of Connecticut’s new “Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety” law has been prepared by Mike Cronin, Esq., a Staff Attorney of the Senate Republicans. The summary, dated April 5, 2013, is available on the Connecticut Senate Republican’s website.
Using a question and answer format, the summary is a guide as how to obey the new gun control law. Typical questions posed in the summary include:
Do I have to give up any of my presently owned guns? How does the new law affect the sale of assault style rifles? Hand guns? Shot guns? What are the new registration requirements for assault style guns, and what are the new limits on ammunition purchases?
Private Guns Sales Covered by New Law
Also, the summary notes that the new gun control law requires a background check for firearm sales, including private transactions.
Here is one of the twenty-four questions asked and answered in Attorney Cronin’s guide:
Q. If I already own a large capacity magazine, can I still use it?
A. Yes. If you legally possess large capacity magazines prior to the passage of this bill you can still use it in your gun. If you are at home or at a target range or shooting clubs, you can load as many bullets as the magazine can hold. Anywhere else, you can only load 10 bullets in the magazine.

State Senator Art Linares
State Senator Art Linares (R-33rd) whose District includes Lyme, voted against the recently enacted, new Connecticut state law, entitled, “An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety.” Connecticut Governor Daniel Malloy signed the bill into law on April 4.
In explaining his “no” vote the Senator said in a written statement, “Having witnessed the emotional accounts of parents, teachers and citizens after the Newtown tragedy, I am more committed than ever to help create a safer Connecticut.”
He continued, “After much consideration and talking with many residents of the 33rd district, I decided to vote no on the bill. While I support some of the individual elements such as criminal background checks and discontinuing the early release program for violent felons, I concluded that [the bill] did not correctly address the most important issues of safe neighborhoods, school security, and most importantly, mental health.”
Following three more paragraphs of explaining the reasons for his “no” vote, the Senator concluded, “Now that [the bill] has passed, I will continue moving forward, working with our school superintendents to address school safety issues, with our mental health experts to get access to needed resources, and with gun owners to help them understand the new regulations.”
Sen. Linares represents the 33rd Senate District, which also includes Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Deep River, East Haddam, East Hampton, Essex, Haddam, Old Saybrook, Portland, and Westbrook.