Letter to the Editor: Support Old Lyme Zoning Against Lawsuit Brought by Smith Neck Rd. Owners After Their Construction Application Denied

To the Editor:

We are writing to express our strong support for the Old Lyme Zoning Commission in its defense against a lawsuit  brought by the Merriam family against the Town of Old Lyme for rejecting their application for a “Special Permit” for new construction at 43 Smiths Neck Road.  

It is unfortunate that given all the advantages that money can bring, the Merriams would choose to sue the Town of Old Lyme rather than use all those resources to create a beautiful home, taking advantage of a unique location, while complying with our Zoning regulations. The plans submitted for the property at 43 Smith Neck Rd have been rejected by both the Gateway Commission and the Town of Old Lyme, but even so, they have the opportunity to resubmit a plan in conformity with zoning. Rather than do this, they have chosen to sue the town.

The Merriams’ argument that their proposed construction should be approved simply because similar houses exist in the area demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of how zoning regulations work. This logic is deeply flawed. Using past construction or outdated regulations to justify new violations is akin to arguing that because the drinking age was once 18, we should continue allowing 18-year-olds to purchase alcohol despite the current legal age being 21. Laws and regulations evolve for good reasons and our community benefits when they are consistently applied.

The Gateway Commission’s standards exist to preserve the unique character and environmental integrity of our community. These guidelines weren’t created arbitrarily but were thoughtfully developed to protect our town’s natural beauty and property values for all residents. The Zoning Commission has a responsibility to uphold these standards uniformly, not to make exceptions based on comparisons to structures that may have been built under different circumstances or different regulatory frameworks.

Perhaps most concerning is that this lawsuit forces Old Lyme taxpayers to foot the bill for legal proceedings that could have been avoided. If the Merriams believe they were misled about what construction was permissible, their grievance lies with the contractors who failed to adhere to Gateway and Zoning regulations, not with the town that is simply enforcing its rules. By suing Old Lyme instead of addressing these issues with their contractors, the Merriams are unnecessarily depleting public resources that could be better used serving our community.

As residents, we all have a stake in ensuring that our zoning regulations are enforced fairly and consistently. The Commission’s stance in this matter protects not just the integrity of our regulations but the interests of all Old Lyme citizens who follow the rules and expect others to do the same.

We urge our fellow residents to stand with the Zoning Commission as it upholds the standards that keep Old Lyme the special place we all choose to call home. Let’s support our town officials who are simply doing their job by enforcing the regulations that protect our community’s character and environment.

Sincerely,

Fred and Andrea Fenton,
Old Lyme

Happy Spring! Happy International Day of Happiness!

“A host of golden daffodils” is a sure sign of spring.

March 20 marks the first day of spring … or the vernal equinox, which occurs at at 5:01 a.m. EST that morning.

It is also the UN’s International Day of Happiness, which is marked by the release of the 13th annual World Happiness Report.

This report ranks the world’s happiest countries by asking people to evaluate their lives. Claiming first place for the eighth year in succession is Finland, followed by Denmark, Iceland and Sweden in that order. The US came in at 24th place—its lowest-ever position.

A few salient points from the report are:

  • Almost 90% of Finns go every week to a sauna, an activity considered good for both physical and mental health.
  • Sharing meals with others was strongly linked with wellbeing. 
  • Declining happiness and social trust in the US … combined to explain the rise and direction of political polarisation.

A glance at some Old Lyme-related social media suggests—and please note, we say this tongue-in-cheek—we all need to eat together more often … and take more saunas!

Town of Old Lyme Proclaims March 15 as ‘David Ruggles Day’

Abolition and Civil Rights champion David Ruggles was born in Lyme, Conn. in 1810 at a time when Lyme and Old Lyme were one town.

OLD LYME—At its meeting on Monday, March 3, the Old Lyme Board of Selectmen voted to proclaim tomorrow, March 15, as ‘David Ruggles Day.’ Visit this link to see the Town’s Proclamation.

Born in Old Lyme on March 15, 1810, Ruggles was a champion of both Abolitionism and Civil Rights.

Old Lyme Selectman Jim Lampos wrote the following biography of Ruggles, which has been published on the ExploreOld Lyme.com website in the new Old Lyme Celebrates 250 section, which celebrates America’s semiquincentennial (250th) birthday next year.

Recognizing David Ruggles
By Jim Lampos

David Ruggles, a native son of our town, is an American hero deserving of recognition and honor for his work advancing the cause of liberty and civil rights. 

He was the first black bookstore owner in the nation, a celebrated author and publisher of abolitionist literature, and a conductor on the underground railroad, personally helping 600 slaves, including Frederick Douglass, make their way to freedom.   

Ruggles was a founder of the tactic of non-violent civil disobedience in the 1840s, deliberately violating Jim Crow laws by sitting in the “white’s only” section of passenger trains, highlighting the injustice of segregation by stoically suffering the consequences of his resistance to it. 

His example set the foundation for the work of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. over a century later.

Born to free black parents in Lyme, Conn. on March 15, 1810 at a time when Lyme and Old Lyme were a single town, David Ruggles was educated in Norwich and moved to New York City at the age of 18 where he quickly established himself as a successful merchant. His grocery store promoted “fair trade” products such as coffee and sugar not manufactured by slave labor.  

One of the nation’s early abolitionists, Ruggles also authored pamphlets and published his own magazine, The Mirror of Liberty, to oppose slavery. His writing was noted for its sharp wit and fiery rhetoric. “Rise, brethren, rise!”  he wrote in 1841, adding, “Strike for freedom or die slaves!”

The greatest testament to his work perhaps came from Frederick Douglass himself, who wrote about David Ruggles in his autobiography. Douglass, a fugitive slave, made his way to New York City where he found himself in “a distressed situation” before he met Ruggles.

Douglass writes: “Mr. Ruggles sought me out and very kindly took me took me to his boarding house,” where he was “attending to a number of other fugitive slaves, devising means for their successful escape, and though watched and hemmed in on almost every side, he seemed more than a match for his enemies.” 

Douglass further notes his gratitude for “the humane hand of Mr. Ruggles, whose vigilance, kindness and perseverance I can never forget. I am glad of an opportunity to express, as far as words can, the love and gratitude I bear him”.  

Likewise, the Town of Old Lyme will always remember David Ruggles and his good work, and in this year of celebrating America’s 250th year of independence, we honor the contribution he has made to our national culture.

Editor’s Note: The ‘Old Lyme Celebrates 250’ section on the ExploreOld Lyme.com website has been written to expand on the countdown to ‘Old Lyme America 250’ celebrations in 2026 by considering the town’s history, and those who have lived in Old Lyme, both past and present. In this section, the ‘Old Lyme America 250’ Committee will be sharing upcoming festivities, lectures, and walking tours related to the Town’s ‘America 250’ celebrations. The section also celebrates the heritage of Old Lyme’s townspeople today.

Op-Ed: Act Now to Stop Halls Rd. Overlay District

Editor’s Note: We received this op-ed from Old Lyme resident Hiram E. Manville IV, who states he was, “Born and raised in Old Lyme (1972)” and is a, “Concerned parent, raising our two- and five-year-olds here in Old Lyme.”

The proposed Halls Road Overlay District (HROD) threatens to permanently alter Old Lyme, overwhelming our infrastructure, endangering the environment, and destroying the character of our town. This reckless plan prioritizes large-scale urbanization over the needs of our community. We must act now to stop it, or the following can happen to our town.

1. Uncontrolled Population Surge

The plan allows up to 40 residential units per acre, potentially bringing thousands of new residents. With 40 acres of developable land, this means up to 1,600 new housing units. This will lead to a major population surge, overwhelming our schools, emergency services, traffic infrastructure, and town resources.

Where It’s Stated in the Proposal:

  • HROD Proposal (Sections 1-4) – Page 6, Section 5.14.6.3 (Special Permit Uses)
    • “No more than 40 dwelling units shall be built per one acre of land.”
  • HROD Appendix – Page 3, Section 5.14.4 (Lot and Bulk Standards)
    • “Maximum building height: 3 stories, up to 35 feet.”

2. Traffic Gridlock & Road Safety Hazards

Halls Road is a major traffic artery. The addition of on-street parking and increased commercial activity will cause severe congestion and safety hazards, making accidents and emergency response delays inevitable.

Where It’s Stated in the Proposal:

  • HROD Proposal – Page 10, Section 5.14.8 (Parking Requirements)
    • “Parking required for the customers and patrons of non-residential uses may be met through a combination of on-street, off-site, and on-site parking.”

3. Environmental & Sewage Catastrophe

Allowing off-site septic systems poses a severe risk to wetlands, drinking water, and local ecosystems. There is no clear infrastructure plan to handle the massive wastewater output this development will generate.

Where It’s Stated in the Proposal:

  • HROD Proposal – Page 6, Section 5.14.6.3 (Special Permit Uses)
    • “Certification of compliance with sewage restrictions shall be provided upon request.”

This shows there is no clear plan for handling increased sewage waste, leaving room for future problems.

4. Massive Overdevelopment & Loss of Small-Town Charm

Buildings up to three stories, 200 feet long, and covering 75% of lot frontages will transform Old Lyme into a dense commercial district, destroying its historic charm and small-town character.

Where It’s Stated in the Proposal:

  • HROD Proposal – Page 3, Section 5.14.4.3 (Lot and Bulk Standards for Qualifying Projects)
    • “Maximum building height: 3 stories, with allowance for a pitched roof to a maximum height of 35′ at peak.”
    • “Buildings must occupy at least 75% of the lot’s Halls Road frontage, but no single building shall exceed 200’ in length or contain a footprint in excess of 20,000 square feet.”

This confirms massive building footprints, leading to a commercialized, city-like landscape.

5. Parking Garages & Commercial Sprawl

Three-story parking garages and massive commercial development will replace open space—replacing small-town charm with an urban-scale, city-like environment that caters to developers rather than residents.

Where It’s Stated in the Proposal:

  • HROD Proposal – Page 10, Section 5.14.8 (Parking Requirements)
    • “Parking garages may be permitted when they are part of a building or structure with an approved HROD use.”
    • “A standalone parking structure must be set back 120 feet from Halls Road and screened to minimize visual impact.”

This confirms the introduction of large parking structures, which contradicts the town’s historic character.

6. Developer Control & Limited Resident Oversight

A small, unelected three-person committee will have final say on zoning approvals. This removes public input from crucial town planning decisions and hands control over to private developers.

Where It’s Stated in the Proposal:

  • HROD Proposal – Page 4, Section 5.14.5 (Design Review Committee)
    • “The Halls Road Overlay District Design Review Committee shall consist of three residents of Old Lyme.”

This confirms zoning decisions will be in the hands of just 3 people, limiting community oversight.

7. No Limit on the Number of Housing Units

Despite claims of a 400-unit cap, the zoning language allows up to 1,600 units across 40 acres. If we allow this zoning to be approved, there will be no stopping further expansions.

Where It’s Stated in the Proposal:

  • HROD Proposal – Page 6, Section 5.14.6.3 (Special Permit Uses – Multi-Family Housing)
    • “No more than 40 dwelling units shall be built per one acre of land.”

Since the overlay district is approximately 40 acres, this means up to 1,600 units could technically be built.

Conclusion & Call to Action

We must act now. If this proposal passes, there is no going back. The small-town character of Old Lyme will be permanently lost. Residents must:

  • Attend town meetings and speak out – especially April 9, 6:30pm @ LOLHS
  • Write to zoning officials demanding they reject this plan.
  • Share this information with neighbors and community groups.
  • Sign petitions and urge friends to get involved.

Contact Information for Zoning Officials:

  • Email: Eric Knapp <eknapp@oldlyme-ct.gov>
  • Email: Craig Bonatti <cbonatti@oldlyme-ct.gov>
  • Email: zoning@oldlyme-ct.gov
  • Phone: (860) 434-1605 ext. 210
  • Address: Memorial Town Hall, 52 Lyme St, Old Lyme, CT 06371

Thank you for your time and consideration of this important matter,

In service,

Hiram E Manville, Old Lyme.

Op-Ed: HROD Benefits Community, Promotes Sustainable Future for Old Lyme—Helps Prevent Real Threats to OL’s Character, Future

Editor’s Note: This op-ed was sent to us by Old Lyme resident Elaine Stiles.

As an Old Lyme resident who cares deeply about sustainable growth and housing access, I am writing to express strong support for the proposed Halls Road Overlay District (HROD) and the development and planning principles that inform it. Old Lyme is a small town, but it is located near two interstate highways, a rail corridor that may soon be significantly expanded, and major employers that draw national and international work forces to the region.

Growth will continue to come to our community, and planning for the future is imperative. I support the Halls Road Overlay District because it offers controls and guidance for future development that will:

  • Offer community residents (present and future) much-needed housing alternatives to single-family detached units. Young single people, young households and families, and elders who want to downsize have few to no rental or ownership options in Old Lyme other than single-family, detached housing and its associated tax burden, maintenance burdens, and isolated settings. Thoughtfully arranged apartment or condominium units and walkable mixed-use development supports aging in place, attracts creative capital and future residents, and provides spaces for diverse household sizes and stages.
  • Reuse existing developed land to meet community housing needs. In the wake of a housing shortage (about 4.5 million units nationwide; in CT, less than 4,000 houses available on the market vs. more than 15,000 pre-pandemic), many communities also face a shortage of developable land. Reusing existing developed spaces to incorporate housing is a smart and environmentally sustainable move to address these critical shortages.
  • Create walkable commercial and community-oriented retail spaces. All communities, regardless of size, can benefit socially and economically from a denser commercial and retail core. The town decided in the 1960s (more than two generations ago) to move that density to the Halls Road area, which changed the character of Old Lyme from its historic land use patterns. It’s now time to retrofit that space for the next several generations with new spaces for a 21st century walkable retail and commercial district gives the town’s residents of all ages another destination where they can connect.
  • Offer better traffic planning, safer multimodal transportation options, and greater community connectivity. Walkable, bikeable spaces would be a boon to our young people, especially nearby middle and high school students, and better connect the cultural and commercial districts of Old Lyme. While maintaining parking supply, the HROD also gets people out of their vehicles and makes more allowances for non-car travel.
  • Encourage creative retrofitting of our existing tired, poorly planned strip mall retail spaces. All over the country, planners are discussing “retrofitting suburbia.” (See June Williamson and Ellen Dunham-Jones’ award-winning book, Retrofitting Suburbia.) The Halls Road Overlay District embraces these smart planning and design principles to remake Old Lyme’s designated commercial and retail space to be automobile accessible, but not dependent; incorporate mixed uses; and increase retail and service options here in town.

Change is coming, and Old Lyme needs to be ready for it. As the Halls Road Improvement Committee has stated, doing nothing is also a choice, and doing nothing has consequences. I am concerned about the fate of the Halls Road area without the HROD, its provisions, and its review procedures in place. Much of the development opponents erroneously fear the HROD will bring will indeed come, but not because of the HROD. Why not incentivize better development patterns than what zoning currently allows as a countermeasure to highly-profitable, but community impoverishing highway-oriented development?

In closing, I want to acknowledge the concerns of small business owners who currently occupy space in the existing strip mall developments on Halls Road regarding rent increases and displacement. No one wants to see businesses displaced, but it is unclear how the HROD, rather than property owners and developers, would be responsible for this outcome. If these parcels sell, there is no guarantee that new owners would not redevelop with the same result. However, I think the community would benefit from understanding if or how the HROD review board or another town entity might be empowered to negotiate rent stabilization considerations for existing businesses in new development under the overlay.

The HROD benefits our community and promotes a sustainable future for Old Lyme and helps prevent the as-of-right services outdated zoning and planning principles currently allow on Halls Road. These are the real threat to our community’s character and future.