Letter to the Editor: Hunt’s Long, Relevant Career Plus Experienced Incumbents Will Create Strong Region 18 Board of Ed. Team

To the Editor:

Old Lyme residents have a dynamic and highly competent slate of Democratic candidates for the Lyme-Old Lyme Board of Education. Included in this group is a former colleague of mine, Dr. Peter Hunt, whom I enthusiastically endorse.

I worked with Dr. Hunt for fifteen years and have great respect for his skill and wisdom as a school psychologist and educator. Dr. Hunt’s 35 years of training and experience in education and child health care will serve the Board—and, therefore, the school district—very well. His principal educational goal is to make sure that children are academically and emotionally supported and successful. He demonstrates the ability to work extremely well with school staff and administrators at every level. Dr. Hunt also served on teams that evaluate all characteristics of schools for national accreditation standards, and he consults with schools and school districts statewide.

Dr. Hunt’s approach to our school system will be thoughtful, reasoned, creative and inspired.  He will make an invaluable contribution to the Board of Education.  I urge you to vote for Peter Hunt and the experienced incumbents, Mimi Roche and Paul Fuchs, on November 3.

Sincerely,

Jeri Baker,
Old Lyme.

Talking Transportation: Good News — and Bad — for Metro-North

It’s been a rough few years for Metro-North what with derailments, crashes and commuter deaths.  But it finally seems like service and safety are coming back.

The best metric of that is the recent surge in ridership, up 1.7 percent compared to last year.  That works out to more than 3,000 additional riders every day.

Certainly this ridership gain is a sign of more people finding jobs. But with gasoline prices near a record low, there’s a reason these folks are training instead of driving:  they like what they see.

  • The trains are on time.  Yes, running slower than in years past, but what’s a few minutes if it means better safety?  What matters most is that the 7:37 shows up at 7:37, plus a minute or so, and arrives in NY pretty close to on-time.  It’s much more dependable now than last winter.
  • There have been no fare increases (at least in Connecticut), even though our fares are still the highest in the nation.
  • There’s more service too:  at least two trains per hour, even in off-peak.  That means more options.
  • And we have the spiffy new M8 railcars, at last.  Riders seem to like the clean, modern interiors and amenities, such a power plugs at each seat.

So for all of these reasons, a lot more people are taking the train.  Good news, right?  Yeah, but in the long run, not so good news because “supply” is not keeping up with “demand”.

More riders without additional capacity means crowding, and we’re already hearing more reports about that, especially at rush hour when some trains are SRO.  And that’s only going to get worse.

The problem is, we didn’t order enough new M8 cars back in 2005 when we placed our order:  just 300 cars for $762 million.  That worked out to $2.54 million per car.

By the time those cars finally went into service in 2011, CDOT and Metro-North realized they should order more. This time, just single un-powered cars, so trains could run with 7 or 9 cars, not just 6, 8 or 10 using the “married pairs” in the original order.

But by then, Kawasaki whacked us $3.3 million per car … and those newest single cars don’t even have motors.   Were we to try ordering more M8 cars today, who knows the price … or delivery time?

From the legislature’s approval of the M8s in 2005 through design, testing and construction, the first M8s took six years to get into service.  The latest single-car order took 4 years.  So even if we were to call Kawasaki today, we couldn’t get new cars until probably 2020 even if we could find the money.

Meanwhile, the Malloy administration is pushing an almost $10 billion, multi-year plan to widen I-95 and I-84.  By the time it’s done, crowding could be so bad on our trains that getting on a four-lane wide interstate might just be better alternative.  Ironic, no?

Jim Cameron

Jim Cameron

Jim Cameron is founder of The Commuter Action Group, and a member of the Darien RTM.  The opinions expressed in this column are only his own.  You can reach him at CommuterActionGroup@gmail.com   For a full collection of “Talking Transportation” columns, see www.talkingtransportation.blogspot.com

Final Day for CT ‘Mission of Mercy’ Free Dental Clinic Today

dental-office-11The Connecticut Foundation for Dental Outreach (CFDO) in collaboration with the Connecticut State Dental Association is hosting the inaugural Connecticut Mission of Mercy Mini MOM Free Dental Clinic today, Sunday, Oct. 11, at the East Lyme High School on 30 Chesterfield St. in East Lyme, CT.  Doors open at 6:00 a.m.

A clinic was held yesterday and had reached its capacity by shortly after 12:30 p.m.  Early registration is therefore advised.

This mini clinic is for the underserved and uninsured who live in the southeast area of Connecticut.  The clinic, also known as CT Mini MOM Free Dental Clinic, will provide dental services (cleanings, extractions, fillings, fluoride treatments and X-rays) to nearly 800 people during the two-days and will feature 30 dental chairs and more than 600 volunteers.  Up to 400 patients will be seen on a first come, first served basis.  For more information visit http://www.cfdo.org or call 860-863-5940.

Established in 2008, the Connecticut Mission of Mercy Free Dental Clinic has treated 15,243 patients and provided $9,336,102 in free dental services to patients. Past clinics were held in Tolland (2008), New Haven (2009), Middletown (2010), Waterbury (2011), Danbury (2012), Bridgeport (2013), Hartford (2014) and Danbury (2015).

Legal News You Can Use: Technology can be Worrisome for Parents

internet_safetySponsored by Suisman Shapiro Attorneys at Law:

The issues facing parents today, as technology ushers in newer and faster means of communicating, are markedly different from those faced by our parents.  Through ever increasing methods of communication, our children have, at their fingertips, the ability to reach a multitude of people in an instant.  Take that instantaneous availability, and mix in the processing and maturity of the adolescent brain, and, in the blink of any eye, circumstances may be set in motion that can immediately change the course of your child’s life.

While the above may seem drastic, it is, nevertheless, true.  On the Internet, our children can access and disseminate child pornography, commit racial and bigotry crimes, and violate our state’s bullying laws, without even knowing it.   Through posts on Facebook, Twitter, Yik Yak, Flickr, Tumblr and MeetUp, just to name a few social media sites, words and images can be sent into the vast world of social media and the internet, where they can be reposted, retweeted, tagged and sent to all corners of the globe.  Once sent, they are there for all to see, including law enforcement.

This onslaught has led organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics to issue clinical reports on the impact of social media and sexting on our children (Fn1).  Further, it has led each state, Connecticut included, to pass laws making it a crime to engage in certain activity that affects the health and safety of our children.

While this article is not meant to be an in depth analysis of each and every statute which criminalizes certain conduct of our children through their use of social media, it bears mentioning some common issues which arise.  One widespread problem that occurs in the educational environment is bullying.

Connecticut has enacted a comprehensive statute, in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Education, to ensure that bullying does not impede our children’s learning environment.  Enactment of criminal laws, some of which are felonies punishable by more than one year in jail, has made it illegal to discriminate on the basis of race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation or gender identity.

Another common problem occurs if your child sends a “visual depiction” of child pornography (nude or showing genitalia) of himself/herself or that of his/her partner, and either one of them is under 16-years-old, they have violated our state’s “possessing or transmitting child pornography” statutes (fn2).  If they use their Facebook account to meet someone under 16, for the purposes of engaging in a sexual act, they have violated our state’s “enticing a minor” statute.

The above is just a snapshot of the complex issues that occur when you mix the not-yet-fully formed mind of a child and the speed of the Internet and social media.  It is also the reason you should seek competent legal representation when confronted with these issues.  Consulting with the right attorney can potentially prevent mistakes such as those mentioned above from affecting your child’s future.

Editor’s Note: Attorney Michael A. Blanchard is a Director at Suisman Shapiro whose practice concentrates in criminal and family law.  Contact him via email at mblanchard@sswbgg.com or via phone at (860) 442-4416 with questions regarding these laws.

Fn1.  Clinical Report-the Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families; O’Keeffe, Gwenn Schurgin, Clarke-Pearson, Kathleen and COUNCIL ON COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA; published online March 28, 2011; Sexting and Sexual Behavior among Middle School Students; Rice, Eric PhD, et als; published online June 30, 2014.

Fn2.  Connecticut General Statutes sections 53a-181i through 53a-181l.

South African Choir Presents Concert Tonight in Old Lyme

The Pretoria Indigenous Choir stands on the steps of the First Congregational Church of Old Lyme. Senior Minister Steve Jungkeit at left and chorus Director Mxolsi Duda at back row third from left.

The University of Pretoria Indigenous Choir stands on the steps of the First Congregational Church of Old Lyme with Senior Minister Steve Jungkeit at left and chorus Director Mxolsi Duda front right, with back to camera.

As part of the First Congregational Church of Old Lyme’s continuing celebrations of its 350th anniversary, a choir made up of 22 members of the University of Pretoria (South Africa) Indigenous Choir will present a concert Saturday, Oct. 10, at 7 p.m. in the church.  All are welcome and admission is free.  A freewill offering will be taken.

The Choir singing at a recent church service.

The Choir singing at a recent church service.

The choir will be directed by Mxolisi Duda, who originally visited the church as a student in 2002. The choir has not only already performed at a number of church services during their stay, but also has visited and sung at several elementary schools.

Smiling faces on arrival in the US.

Smiling faces on arrival in the US.

For more information, visit www.fccol.org or call 860.434.8686.